Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1424915

Summary:	dht_setxattr returns EINVAL when a file is deleted during the FOP
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha>
Component:	distribute	Assignee:	Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	3.8	CC:	bugs
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	glusterfs-3.8.10	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1421653	Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-03-18 10:52:28 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1421653, 1424921, 1424925, 1425697
Bug Blocks:

Description Nithya Balachandran 2017-02-20 04:46:41 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1421653 +++

Description of problem:

dht_setxattr returns EINVAL when a file is deleted after the FOP hits dht_setxattr.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Consistently


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a dist-rep volume (I used a 4x2)
2. Fuse mount the volume on 2 different mount points (/mnt/g1 and /mnt/g2)
3. gdb into the mount process for /mnt/g2 and set a breakpoint on dht_setxattr
4. From /mnt/g1, touch file1
5. From /mnt/g2, set an xattr on file1. This will hit the breakpoint set in (3)
6. From /mnt/g1, rm file1
7. Continue in gdb


Actual results:
[root@rhgs313-6 g2]# setfattr -n trusted.test.yahh -v "testing 1 2 3..." file1 
setfattr: file1: Invalid argument



Expected results:
[root@rhgs313-6 g2]# setfattr -n trusted.test.yahh -v "testing 1 2 3..." file1
setfattr: file1: No such file or directory


Additional info:

The same issue shows up in dht_removexattr as well. (Repeat the test steps with the breakpoint in dht_removexattr and "setxfattr -x" )

--- Additional comment from Nithya Balachandran on 2017-02-13 06:18:29 EST ---

RCA: 

op_errno is not set to local->op_errno in dht_setxattr2 immediately after the frame check. This causes the function to unwind with op_errno set to EINVAL in case of error.

The null subvol check has also been moved to after op_errno is set to local->op_errno in dht_removexattr2 .

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-02-13 06:22:04 EST ---

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16610 (cluster/dht Correct error assignment in *xattr2 functions) posted (#1) for review on master by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-02-13 06:22:49 EST ---

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16610 (cluster/dht Fix error assignment in dht_*xattr2 functions) posted (#2) for review on master by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-02-15 20:53:52 EST ---

COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/16610 committed in master by Shyamsundar Ranganathan (srangana) 
------
commit 028626a86ea409f908783b9007c02877f20be43e
Author: N Balachandran <nbalacha>
Date:   Mon Feb 13 16:49:06 2017 +0530

    cluster/dht Fix error assignment in dht_*xattr2 functions
    
    Corrected the op_errno assignments and NULL checks in
    the dht_sexattr2 and dht_removexattr2 functions. Earlier,
    they unwound with the default EINVAL op_errno if the
    file had been deleted.
    
    Change-Id: Iaf837a473d769cea40132487a966c7f452990071
    BUG: 1421653
    Signed-off-by: N Balachandran <nbalacha>
    Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16610
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: MOHIT AGRAWAL <moagrawa>
    Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana>

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2017-02-20 04:50:13 UTC

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16678 (cluster/dht Fix error assignment in dht_*xattr2 functions) posted (#1) for review on release-3.8 by N Balachandran (nbalacha)

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2017-03-10 22:42:46 UTC

COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/16678 committed in release-3.8 by Niels de Vos (ndevos) 
------
commit f4ad9c9eb7f062198189801ddc8cfd958bb413d9
Author: N Balachandran <nbalacha>
Date:   Mon Feb 13 16:49:06 2017 +0530

    cluster/dht Fix error assignment in dht_*xattr2 functions
    
    Corrected the op_errno assignments and NULL checks in
    the dht_sexattr2 and dht_removexattr2 functions. Earlier,
    they unwound with the default EINVAL op_errno if the
    file had been deleted.
    
    > Change-Id: Iaf837a473d769cea40132487a966c7f452990071
    > BUG: 1421653
    > Signed-off-by: N Balachandran <nbalacha>
    > Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16610
    > Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    > NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    > CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    > Reviewed-by: MOHIT AGRAWAL <moagrawa>
    > Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana>
    (cherry picked from commit 028626a86ea409f908783b9007c02877f20be43e)
    Signed-off-by: N Balachandran <nbalacha>
    
    Change-Id: Id2e91df47bcd734dda18700fb075608c1627a608
    BUG: 1424915
    Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16678
    Tested-by: N Balachandran <nbalacha>
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana>

Comment 3 Niels de Vos 2017-03-18 10:52:28 UTC

This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.8.10, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.8.10 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2017-March/000068.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/