Bug 1424997 - [RFE] Update fluentd configuration to fit the common data model
Summary: [RFE] Update fluentd configuration to fit the common data model
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: ovirt-engine-metrics
Classification: oVirt
Component: RFEs
Version: 1.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ovirt-4.1.1-1
: 1.0.1
Assignee: Shirly Radco
QA Contact: Lukas Svaty
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: oVirt-Metrics-and-Logs 1428386
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-02-20 10:11 UTC by Shirly Radco
Modified: 2017-10-04 13:56 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-04-21 09:31:35 UTC
oVirt Team: Metrics
Embargoed:
sradco: ovirt-4.1?
sradco: ovirt-4.2?
sradco: exception?
lsvaty: testing_plan_complete-
sradco: planning_ack?
sradco: devel_ack+
pstehlik: testing_ack+

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
oVirt gerrit 74452 0 master MERGED fluentd:update hosts and engine ovirt-processing.conf 2017-03-21 19:53:08 UTC

Description Shirly Radco 2017-02-20 10:11:28 UTC 
Description of problem:

As part of the common data model we need to update the fluentd.conf so data we be saved in the metrics store in the pre-defined common data model.
Comment 2 Lukas Svaty 2017-03-29 14:32:03 UTC 
what needs to be tested here?
Comment 3 Lukas Svaty 2017-03-30 10:44:07 UTC 
after discussion with DEV adding CodeChange and moving to verified without qa process
Comment 4 Yedidyah Bar David 2017-03-30 11:32:32 UTC 
I am by no means a "data model" expert, but I think I disagree.

What if in the future the data model is changed, so all parties do their changes (client fluentd, elasticsearch, perhaps server fluentd, kibana (or customization of it))? And what happens if there is an agreement about such a change, but only some parts are changed? Won't the user see anything anywhere? Won't fluentd or elastic fail, or kibana will show wrong/different results? All of these are user visible.

IMO CodeChange is reserved for refactoring inside a single project that if done correctly is invisible to users.
Comment 5 Shirly Radco 2017-03-30 11:59:42 UTC 
The data model is still wip. 
I'll add documentation and it should tested on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1434575
It still has frequent updates like adding the engine_fqdn, env_name etc.
Comment 6 Lukas Svaty 2017-03-30 12:17:06 UTC 
Dependant bug is ovirt-4.1.2 this one is planned for ovirt-4.1.1 please move it accordingly or remove the dependency
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.