Bug 1425421 - Moving multiple temporary files to the same destination concurrently causes ESTALE error
Summary: Moving multiple temporary files to the same destination concurrently causes E...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1488120
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: distribute
Version: rhgs-3.2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Raghavendra G
QA Contact: Prasad Desala
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1378550 1488120 1543279 1576291
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-02-21 12:10 UTC by Prasad Desala
Modified: 2018-05-09 07:24 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1378550
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-27 09:43:05 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Prasad Desala 2017-02-21 12:10:09 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1378550 +++

Description of problem:
We have an application which leverage POSIX atomic move semantic. Therefore, we allow the same file to be uploaded multiple times, since it can be commited atomically to the file system. However, when multiple clients try to upload the same file concurrently, some gets a ESTALE error on the move operation.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.7.5, 3.8.4

How reproducible:
It can be reproduced by creating lots of temporary file concurrently, on multiple machines, and to try to move them to the same final location.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Log on multiple machines
1. Execute "while true; do uuid="`uuidgen`"; echo "some data" > "test$uuid"; mv "test$uuid" "test" -f; done &"
2. Wait until the move command fails

Actual results:
mv: cannot move ‘test5f4c981f-efcb-4ba8-b017-cf4acb76abcc’ to ‘test’: No such file or directory
mv: cannot move ‘test7cf00867-4982-4206-abcf-e5e836460eda’ to ‘test’: No such file or directory
mv: cannot move ‘testcacb6c40-c164-435f-b118-7a14687bf4bd’ to ‘test’: No such file or directory
mv: cannot move ‘test956ff19d-0a16-49bd-a877-df18311570dc’ to ‘test’: No such file or directory
mv: cannot move ‘test6e36eb01-9e54-4b50-8de8-cebb063554ba’ to ‘test’: Structure needs cleaning

Expected results:
No output because no error

Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Pranith Kumar K on 2016-10-17 05:22:19 EDT ---

Du, Nitya,
       Based on my debugging inodelk keeps failing with ESTALE. When I checked dht_rename(), I see that the inodelk is done both on source and destination inodes. But because the test above can lead to deletion of the file we are trying to lock on by the other 'while ()...' process the inodelk fails with ESTALE. When I changed the test to rename to independent filenames, then everything works as expected.
On mount1:
while true; do uuid="`uuidgen`"; echo "some data" > "test$uuid"; mv "test$uuid" "test" -f; done

On mount2:
while true; do uuid="`uuidgen`"; echo "some data" > "test$uuid"; mv "test$uuid" "test2" -f; done

Not sure how to fix this in DHT though. For now re-assigning the bug to DHT.

--- Additional comment from Raghavendra G on 2016-10-17 07:09:14 EDT ---

(In reply to Pranith Kumar K from comment #1)
> Du, Nitya,
>        Based on my debugging inodelk keeps failing with ESTALE. When I
> checked dht_rename(), I see that the inodelk is done both on source and
> destination inodes. But because the test above can lead to deletion of the
> file we are trying to lock on by the other 'while ()...' process the inodelk
> fails with ESTALE. When I changed the test to rename to independent
> filenames, then everything works as expected.
> On mount1:
> while true; do uuid="`uuidgen`"; echo "some data" > "test$uuid"; mv
> "test$uuid" "test" -f; done
> 
> On mount2:
> while true; do uuid="`uuidgen`"; echo "some data" > "test$uuid"; mv
> "test$uuid" "test2" -f; done
> 
> Not sure how to fix this in DHT though. For now re-assigning the bug to DHT.

locking in dht_rename has two purposes:
1. serialize and ensure atomicity (of each rename) when two parallel renames are done on the same file.
2. serialize a rename with file migration during rebalance.

The current use-case falls into category 1. I think using entrylk instead of inodelk solves the problem. However need to think more about this.

Assigning bug to Kotresh as he is working on synchronization issues.

--- Additional comment from Pranith Kumar K on 2016-10-17 08:10:22 EDT ---

(In reply to Raghavendra G from comment #2)
> (In reply to Pranith Kumar K from comment #1)
> > Du, Nitya,
> >        Based on my debugging inodelk keeps failing with ESTALE. When I
> > checked dht_rename(), I see that the inodelk is done both on source and
> > destination inodes. But because the test above can lead to deletion of the
> > file we are trying to lock on by the other 'while ()...' process the inodelk
> > fails with ESTALE. When I changed the test to rename to independent
> > filenames, then everything works as expected.
> > On mount1:
> > while true; do uuid="`uuidgen`"; echo "some data" > "test$uuid"; mv
> > "test$uuid" "test" -f; done
> > 
> > On mount2:
> > while true; do uuid="`uuidgen`"; echo "some data" > "test$uuid"; mv
> > "test$uuid" "test2" -f; done
> > 
> > Not sure how to fix this in DHT though. For now re-assigning the bug to DHT.
> 
> locking in dht_rename has two purposes:
> 1. serialize and ensure atomicity (of each rename) when two parallel renames
> are done on the same file.
> 2. serialize a rename with file migration during rebalance.
> 
> The current use-case falls into category 1. I think using entrylk instead of
> inodelk solves the problem. However need to think more about this.
> 
> Assigning bug to Kotresh as he is working on synchronization issues.

Just a word of caution, that it is important to do it in backward compatible way.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.