Bug 142549 - Enabling printer sharing only opens ipp:udp port
Summary: Enabling printer sharing only opens ipp:udp port
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 90946
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: system-config-securitylevel
Version: 3
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Chris Lumens
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-12-10 15:52 UTC by Matthew Saltzman
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:10 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-03-29 16:55:02 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Matthew Saltzman 2004-12-10 15:52:34 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7)
Gecko/20040808 Firefox/0.9.3

Description of problem:
When sharing is enabled for a locally connected printer, ipp:udp is
opened in iptables, but ipp:tcp is not.  The effect is that the
printer is viewable from client machines, but jobs queue on the client
without printing.

Opening ipp:tcp on the server in system-config-securitylevel causes
the client's queue to flush and all jobs to print.  Also allows
client's eggcups to view job status, which it won't do without the TCP
port open.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
system-config-printer-0.6.116-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Use system-config-printer to enable sharing.
2. Check firewall status with "service iptables status".
3. Print a job to the shared printer from another machine via IPP.
    

Actual Results:  In step 2, ipp:udp is open, but ipp:tcp is not.
In step 3, job hangs in queue.  Client's eggcups shows unknown name
and size.

Expected Results:  In step 2, probably ipp:tcp should be open as well.
In step 3, job should print and eggcups should show proper name and size.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2004-12-10 15:59:59 UTC
system-config-printer doesn't open any ports at all, because there is no
infrastructure to do so. (I've been saying this for *ages*.)

Comment 2 Paul Nasrat 2004-12-10 16:07:34 UTC
Yeah we should sort for FC4.

Comment 3 Chris Lumens 2005-03-29 16:55:02 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 90946 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.