Bug 142552 - No package listing for Fedora Core 1 or 3
Summary: No package listing for Fedora Core 1 or 3
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Web Site
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation   
(Show other bugs)
Version: current
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: John Ha
QA Contact:
URL: http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/package...
Keywords: Documentation
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2004-12-10 16:19 UTC by Jeremiah Johnson
Modified: 2014-08-04 22:15 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-08-03 03:23:04 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jeremiah Johnson 2004-12-10 16:19:17 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.12

Description of problem:
While there is a package listing for Fedora Core 2, there are no package listings for Fedora Core 1, or 3.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Goto url
3. Profit

Additional info:

Comment 1 Need Real Name 2005-01-16 17:54:51 UTC
This is not a bug, apparently this is how they want it (tfox).
The plan is that the package list moves to fedora legacy when a new
release is made.

Probably a bigger problem than version specific pages is that the
fedora website is neglected as soon as a release is made. i.e. the
current package list (as you say) is for FC2, and the schedule doesn't
mention that FC3 has been released, or that FC4's schedule is under

A better bug would be that there appears to be no coordination between
Fedora releases and the Fedora website, and the version control for
the Fedora website is lacking. I don't remember the author, but a
prominent "web person" claims that no URL should ever expire, and in
this case I think he is right.

Example layout:

fedora.redhat.com/package-list - current package list
fedora.redhat.com/fc1/package-list - fc1 package list
fedora.redhat.com/fc2/package-list - fc2 package list
fedora.redhat.com/fc3/package-list - fc3 package list

*deep breath, presses Commit*

Comment 2 Need Real Name 2005-01-16 19:56:02 UTC
The Bug Activity page said I removed jha@redhat.com as QAContact.
Not true.

Will try to re-add. Nope - not allowed.

Comment 3 Need Real Name 2006-08-04 18:52:19 UTC
This is a bug, because it prevents a sysadmin checking whether a particular
distro contains a given package, and what version of that package it contains.

Not having this is one of Fedora's weakpoints.
Fedora needs a packages.debian.org equivalent.

Why was this closed as not a bug?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.