Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 142552 - No package listing for Fedora Core 1 or 3
No package listing for Fedora Core 1 or 3
Product: Red Hat Web Site
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: John Ha
: Documentation
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-12-10 11:19 EST by Jeremiah Johnson
Modified: 2014-08-04 18:15 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-08-02 23:23:04 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Jeremiah Johnson 2004-12-10 11:19:17 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.5.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.12

Description of problem:
While there is a package listing for Fedora Core 2, there are no package listings for Fedora Core 1, or 3.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Goto url
3. Profit

Additional info:
Comment 1 Need Real Name 2005-01-16 12:54:51 EST
This is not a bug, apparently this is how they want it (tfox).
The plan is that the package list moves to fedora legacy when a new
release is made.

Probably a bigger problem than version specific pages is that the
fedora website is neglected as soon as a release is made. i.e. the
current package list (as you say) is for FC2, and the schedule doesn't
mention that FC3 has been released, or that FC4's schedule is under

A better bug would be that there appears to be no coordination between
Fedora releases and the Fedora website, and the version control for
the Fedora website is lacking. I don't remember the author, but a
prominent "web person" claims that no URL should ever expire, and in
this case I think he is right.

Example layout:

fedora.redhat.com/package-list - current package list
fedora.redhat.com/fc1/package-list - fc1 package list
fedora.redhat.com/fc2/package-list - fc2 package list
fedora.redhat.com/fc3/package-list - fc3 package list

*deep breath, presses Commit*
Comment 2 Need Real Name 2005-01-16 14:56:02 EST
The Bug Activity page said I removed jha@redhat.com as QAContact.
Not true.

Will try to re-add. Nope - not allowed.
Comment 3 Need Real Name 2006-08-04 14:52:19 EDT
This is a bug, because it prevents a sysadmin checking whether a particular
distro contains a given package, and what version of that package it contains.

Not having this is one of Fedora's weakpoints.
Fedora needs a packages.debian.org equivalent.

Why was this closed as not a bug?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.