Core component tripleo-quickstart which should be used by default instead of instack-virstsetup to setup development environment is unpackages. Ara is one of it's unpackaged dependencies. https://github.com/dmsimard/ara
It has been moved to https://github.com/openstack/ara but it is "Stackforge" not an OpenStack project, so it would be in RDO deps repo, not RDO Trunk.
$ licensecheck ara ara/.coveragerc: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ara/.gitreview: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ara/LICENSE: *No copyright* Apache (v2.0) ara/README.rst: Apache (v2.0) GENERATED FILE ara/bindep.txt: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ara/requirements.txt: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ara/run_tests.sh: Apache (v2.0) ara/setup.cfg: *No copyright* Apache ara/setup.py: Apache (v2.0) ara/test-requirements.txt: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ara/tox.ini: *No copyright* UNKNOWN [apevec@gig4 openstack]$
Actually, this should be moved to Fedora/PackageReview
Hi, ARA author here :) I had already started some initial work to package ARA, last attempt here [1]. I don't remember if it works or makes sense, that's just where I left off. I had done some necessary work to get rid of unpackaged dependencies (ex: [2][3]) but there's still some work to do before ARA can be packaged properly. What's probably the next big item is to switch ARA to use xstatic packages for javascript/css libraries as ARA currently embeds them (bad, I know). It's quite likely that some of the static dependencies will need to be packaged first but the good news is that ARA doesn't need anything arcane -- it uses the same css/js framework as tripleo-ui. [1]: https://gist.github.com/dmsimard/8938d525f7bd2cd4a749f9b72bb5009e [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409852/ [3]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409458/
Why it's not submitted to Fedora? It's general-purpose tooling.
+1 with Haïkel's comment : as it can be used outside of RDO, I'd personally like to see it available through Fedora and so Epel too
Same for me, I would like to use it on our infras.
Moved to fedora/package-review. I'll try and see if I can get a spec going sometime soon.
(Renaming bug temporarily, there is nothing to review here yet)
Just an update, I've started unbundling in-tree libraries in favor of xstatic packages -- you can follow the work here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/ara+topic:unbundle-libs For now: - Implementation of framework and jquery unbundling: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459071/ - bootstrap unbundling: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459073/ I've also started working on packaging Patternfly in XStatic on pypi as it is not currently packaged. Once that is done, I'll work on a fedora package for XStatic-Patternfly.
Patternfly Xstatic is now on PyPi: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/XStatic-Patternfly/ And the unbundling review in ara for patternfly is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459074/
The last lib that needs to be unbundled is jquery.datatables. I've reached out to maintainers because xstatic-datatables hasn't been updated in four years on PyPi. I'm now a maintainer and update is pending here: https://github.com/python-xstatic/datatables/pull/1
python-xstatic-patternfly ready for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444666
python-xstatic-datatables ready for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444682
@David : thanks a lot for the detailed report about where you are right now. thanks a lot for your work : really appreciated ! :-)
Quick update, I have a working spec [1] and got a working scratch build [2], just need to do some more tweaking, release ARA 0.13.0 (first version with unbundled deps) and I'll submit a formal review here. [1]: https://github.com/dmsimard/ara-distgit/blob/master/ara.spec [2]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19299910
Got a working spec with what I wanted in it. However, a last minute (important) addition to the next release of ARA requires two new fedora packages, one of which will also need to be packaged on PyPi first.
Package review for python-xstatic-patternfly-bootstrap-treeview: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447089
Package review for python-pyfakefs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447120
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dmsimard/ara-distgit/master/ara.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/dmsimard/ara-distgit/raw/master/ara-0.13.0-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: Review Request: ara - Ansible Run Analysis, Record and visualize Ansible Playbook runs Koji scratch build available at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19465617 Notes: This is the first formal spec review for ARA after packaging everything that was missing. Summary of considerations inside the spec: - We create an "ara" user and an "ara" group - We create /etc/ara and ship a default configuration - We create /var/lib/ara (which is referenced in the default configuration) - We create /var/log/ara (which is referenced in the default configuration) - We ship a systemd unit file for running the embedded server in a persistent way for convenience. The systemd unit requires /etc/ara/ara.cfg and works with the default configuration out of the box and listens on 127.0.0.1:9191. - There are separate packages for ara itself, the docs and the tests - Only the py2 unit tests run in %check since ARA is not fully python 3 ready yet Let me know if you have any questions !
Tried to do a copr build for this was never really able to get it to succeed. Not sure what the problem is, but didn't really dig into it either. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/dustymabe/ara/builds/
@Dustin, I've only tried a build against rawhide (scratch build) since all the new packages have not yet landed in the different releases. You can look at the bugs linked to this one for details. I'll try and look if there's anything else that could be causing problems on other versions when I have a chance.
makes sense, I can see they are not all in f25 branch. Thanks
can we get those 'deps' submitted as updates for the other branches?
They all have been, so far as as I am aware, unless I missed something. Some are still pending on Bohdi: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/users/dmsimard
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dmsimard/ara-distgit/master/ara.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/dmsimard/ara-distgit/raw/master/ara-0.13.0-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: ara - Ansible Run Analysis, Record and visualize Ansible Playbook runs Koji scratch build available at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19465617 Notes: A recent bug report indicated that we needed to require a minimum Jinja2 version https://review.openstack.org/#/c/463572/
So for those interested in seeing this in EPEL7 a quick run through of the requires in the spec shows: # new things to arrive in epel7 python2-debtcollector python2-pyfakefs python2-pigments python2-XStatic-DataTables python2-XStatic-Patternfly python2-XStatic-Patternfly-Treeview python2-frozen-flask # conditional requires due to naming differences python2-flask python2-decorator python2-lxml python2-pytest python2-sqlalchemy python2-XStatic python2-XStatic-Bootstrap-SCSS python2-XStatic-jQuery # version question due to older RHEL7 base version python-jinja2 In addition, though it's not highlighted as a version issue here, dmsimard pointed out ot me on reddit that python2-pyfakefs needs a newer version of pytest than ships in RHEL7 base. It'd be great to identify exactly what is driving the higher version requirements on pytest and python-jinja2 to see if these can be made compatible with what ships in RHEL7.
@James, thanks for looking. python-jinja is a hard requirement from ARA itself, there are known issues using macros with a version lower than 2.9 [1]. pytest 2.8.6 also appears to be required for pyfakefs, upstream mentioned lower than that there could be issues [2]. I haven't yet got around to chasing EPEL7 missing requirements that I didn't personally package (debtcollector, pigments, frozen-flask). [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/463572/ [2]: https://github.com/jmcgeheeiv/pyfakefs/issues/179#issuecomment-298407916
Just a small update, as much as I'd like to be able to wrap this up, I'm not going to be able to look into this until at least the second half of june. To recapitulate, everything looks good except for EPEL7 we need the following: pytest >= 2.8.6 (base OS 2.7.0) python-jinja2 => 2.9 (base OS 2.7.2) Since those are provided by the base operating system, I don't believe we can get them updated within EPEL and therefore have to rely on a SIG repository for them. I'll try and see how we can address this at a later time.
(In reply to David Moreau Simard from comment #29) > Just a small update, as much as I'd like to be able to wrap this up, I'm not > going to be able to look into this until at least the second half of june. > > To recapitulate, everything looks good except for EPEL7 we need the Is it possible to go ahead and get everything into Fedora and leave epel as a later exercise?
@Dusty, unless mistaken everything is in Fedora except ARA itself by now. Need a fedora packager to review the proposed spec: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426193#c26
Ok, so I can review it (and so assigning the bug per process)
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated - Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages. The documentation bundle fonts. However, this is likely normal. - The %check in # Test dependencies for %check could cause trouble in the future (since rpm would expand the macro. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "*No copyright* Apache", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 80 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/fr/1426193-ara/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/systemd/system, /etc/logrotate.d, /usr/lib/systemd [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 7 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages. Note: Package contains font files [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-ara , python3-ara , ara-common , ara-doc [ ]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ara-0.13.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm ara-python3-0.13.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python2-ara-0.13.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python2-ara-tests-0.13.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python3-ara-0.13.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python3-ara-tests-0.13.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm ara-common-0.13.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm ara-doc-0.13.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm ara-0.13.0-1.fc25.src.rpm ara.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C ARA ara.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-2 ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-2.7 ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-manage ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-manage-2 ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-manage-2.7 ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-wsgi ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-wsgi-2 ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-wsgi-2.7 ara-python3.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara-python3.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-3 ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-3.6 ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-manage-3 ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-manage-3.6 ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-wsgi-3 ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-wsgi-3.6 python2-ara.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible python2-ara.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible python2-ara.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/db/env.py python2-ara.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/db/script.py.mako python2-ara.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/manage.py /usr/bin/env python python2-ara.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/manage.py 644 /usr/bin/env python python2-ara-tests.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible python2-ara-tests.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/tests/integration/helpers/junit_check.py /usr/bin/env python python2-ara-tests.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/tests/integration/helpers/junit_check.py 644 /usr/bin/env python python3-ara.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible python3-ara.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/db/env.py python3-ara.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/db/script.py.mako python3-ara.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/manage.py /usr/bin/env python python3-ara.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/manage.py 644 /usr/bin/env python python3-ara-tests.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible python3-ara-tests.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/tests/integration/helpers/junit_check.py /usr/bin/env python python3-ara-tests.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/tests/integration/helpers/junit_check.py 644 /usr/bin/env python ara-common.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/ara/ara.cfg ara ara-common.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ara/ara.cfg 640 ara-common.noarch: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/ara ara-common.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/ara ara ara-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/ara ara ara-common.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/ara 750 ara-common.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ara ara ara-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/ara ara ara-common.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/ara 750 ara-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/ara-doc/html/.buildinfo ara-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/ara-doc/html/.doctrees ara-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/ara-doc/html/.doctrees ara.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C ARA ara.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara.src:52: W: macro-in-comment %check ara.src:125: W: macro-in-comment %check ara.src: E: specfile-error Python runtime initialized with LC_CTYPE=C (a locale with default ASCII encoding), which may cause Unicode compatibility problems. Using C.UTF-8, C.utf8, or UTF-8 (if available) as alternative Unicode-compatible locales is recommended. ara.src: E: specfile-error Python runtime initialized with LC_CTYPE=C (a locale with default ASCII encoding), which may cause Unicode compatibility problems. Using C.UTF-8, C.utf8, or UTF-8 (if available) as alternative Unicode-compatible locales is recommended. ara.src: E: specfile-error Python runtime initialized with LC_CTYPE=C (a locale with default ASCII encoding), which may cause Unicode compatibility problems. Using C.UTF-8, C.utf8, or UTF-8 (if available) as alternative Unicode-compatible locales is recommended. ara.src: E: specfile-error Python runtime initialized with LC_CTYPE=C (a locale with default ASCII encoding), which may cause Unicode compatibility problems. Using C.UTF-8, C.utf8, or UTF-8 (if available) as alternative Unicode-compatible locales is recommended. ara.src: E: specfile-error Python runtime initialized with LC_CTYPE=C (a locale with default ASCII encoding), which may cause Unicode compatibility problems. Using C.UTF-8, C.utf8, or UTF-8 (if available) as alternative Unicode-compatible locales is recommended. ara.src: E: specfile-error Python runtime initialized with LC_CTYPE=C (a locale with default ASCII encoding), which may cause Unicode compatibility problems. Using C.UTF-8, C.utf8, or UTF-8 (if available) as alternative Unicode-compatible locales is recommended. 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 22 errors, 40 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-ara-tests.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible python3-ara-tests.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/tests/integration/helpers/junit_check.py /usr/bin/env python python3-ara-tests.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/tests/integration/helpers/junit_check.py 644 /usr/bin/env python python2-ara.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible python2-ara.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible python2-ara.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/db/env.py python2-ara.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/db/script.py.mako python2-ara.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/manage.py /usr/bin/env python python2-ara.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/manage.py 644 /usr/bin/env python python3-ara.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible python3-ara.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/db/env.py python3-ara.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/db/script.py.mako python3-ara.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/manage.py /usr/bin/env python python3-ara.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ara/manage.py 644 /usr/bin/env python python2-ara-tests.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible python2-ara-tests.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/tests/integration/helpers/junit_check.py /usr/bin/env python python2-ara-tests.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ara/tests/integration/helpers/junit_check.py 644 /usr/bin/env python ara.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C ARA ara.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-2 ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-2.7 ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-manage ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-manage-2 ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-manage-2.7 ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-wsgi ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-wsgi-2 ara.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-wsgi-2.7 ara-common.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/ara/ara.cfg ara ara-common.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ara/ara.cfg 640 ara-common.noarch: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/ara ara-common.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/ara ara ara-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/ara ara ara-common.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/ara 750 ara-common.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ara ara ara-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/ara ara ara-common.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/ara 750 ara-python3.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara-python3.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-3 ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-3.6 ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-manage-3 ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-manage-3.6 ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-wsgi-3 ara-python3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ara-wsgi-3.6 ara-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ansible -> Expansible, Sensible ara-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/ara-doc/html/.buildinfo ara-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/ara-doc/html/.doctrees ara-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/ara-doc/html/.doctrees 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 16 errors, 35 warnings. Requires -------- python3-ara-tests (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3-ara python3-lxml python3-pytest python2-ara (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ansible python(abi) python-cliff python-flask-script python-frozen-flask python2-XStatic python2-XStatic-Bootstrap-SCSS python2-XStatic-DataTables python2-XStatic-Patternfly python2-XStatic-Patternfly-Bootstrap-Treeview python2-XStatic-jQuery python2-debtcollector python2-decorator python2-flask python2-flask-migrate python2-jinja2 python2-junit_xml python2-pyfakefs python2-pygments python2-sqlalchemy python3-ara (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ansible-python3 python(abi) python3-XStatic python3-XStatic-Bootstrap-SCSS python3-XStatic-DataTables python3-XStatic-Patternfly python3-XStatic-Patternfly-Bootstrap-Treeview python3-XStatic-jQuery python3-cliff python3-debtcollector python3-decorator python3-flask python3-flask-migrate python3-flask-script python3-frozen-flask python3-jinja2 python3-junit_xml python3-pyfakefs python3-pygments python3-sqlalchemy python2-ara-tests (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python-pytest python2-ara python2-lxml ara (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh /usr/bin/python2 ara-common python2-ara systemd ara-common (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh config(ara-common) shadow-utils ara-python3 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 ara-common python3-ara ara-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- python3-ara-tests: python3-ara-tests python2-ara: python-ara python2-ara python2.7dist(ara) python2dist(ara) python3-ara: python3-ara python3.6dist(ara) python3dist(ara) python2-ara-tests: python2-ara-tests ara: ara ara-common: ara-common config(ara-common) ara-python3: ara-python3 ara-doc: ara-doc Source checksums ---------------- https://pypi.io/packages/source/a/ara/ara-0.13.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 13aa1b20065fa2cae819b045e57b7c55983ca60e830ac2e72b056c322a743900 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 13aa1b20065fa2cae819b045e57b7c55983ca60e830ac2e72b056c322a743900 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1426193 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
so we have passed review and now just need this in dist-git and built?
@Dusty, this is correct. I've been super busy recently, I hope to be able to get this going soon.
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ara
Started slowly working on this. Turns out newer version of pytest landed in the meantime and caused unit tests to fail on my attempts at building for rawhide. This commit [1] should hopefully allow the unit tests to work across different versions of pytest and let us proceed with packaging. [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/484618/
ara-0.14.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ba5ec558e7
ara-0.14.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ba5ec558e7