Ah, I see its an upstream bug. Please ensure that all the downstream tracker bugs are removed from upstream bugs.
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16770 (fixes : NFS subdir mount for Solaris client) posted (#1) for review on master by bipin kunal (bkunal)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16770 (nfs: make subdir mounting work for Solaris 10 clients) posted (#2) for review on master by bipin kunal (bkunal)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16770 (nfs: make subdir mounting work for Solaris 10 clients) posted (#3) for review on master by Niels de Vos (ndevos)
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/16770 committed in master by Niels de Vos (ndevos) ------ commit 40e571339b3c19ab2a5b6a93bc46eadf2252d006 Author: Bipin Kunal <bkunal> Date: Mon Feb 27 15:23:04 2017 +0530 nfs: make subdir mounting work for Solaris 10 clients This fixes the segfault caused by solaris client in Gluster/NFS. Volname was not being parsed properly, Instead of volume name complete path was being used in nfs_mntpath_to_xlator(). Fixed it by striping volume name from complete path in nfs_mntpath_to_xlator(). Modified function name nfs3_funge_solaris_zerolen_fh() to nfs3_funge_webnfs_zerolen_fh() as zero-filled filehandle is specific to WebNFS. RFC : https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2055 Solaris uses WebNFS, the zero-filled FH is defined in the WebNFS spec. Logic was even added in fuction nfs3_funge_webnfs_zerolen_fh() to send subdir path in function glfs_resolve_at() instead of complete path for subdir mount. Change-Id: I19aae3547b8910e7ed4974ee5385424cab3e834a BUG: 1426667 Signed-off-by: Bipin Kunal <bkunal> Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16770 Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17016 (nfs: make subdir mounting work for Solaris 10 clients) posted (#1) for review on release-3.8 by bipin kunal (bkunal)
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.11.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.11.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2017-May/000073.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/