Bug 1427087 - GTasks pagination doesn't work
Summary: GTasks pagination doesn't work
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libgdata
Version: 7.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Debarshi Ray
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-02-27 10:34 UTC by Milan Crha
Modified: 2017-08-01 10:00 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-01 10:00:10 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
GNOME Bugzilla 775813 0 None None None 2019-08-02 06:20:45 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:2310 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE gnome-online-accounts and libgdata bug fix update 2017-08-01 12:42:37 UTC

Description Milan Crha 2017-02-27 10:34:29 UTC
Upstream libgdata has a fix for GTasks pagination [1], which doesn't work. It means that when users have more than 100 tasks, then those are not provided to him/her due to the pagination absence. Evoltuion-data-server 3.22.6+ will contain a prepared fix [2], thus it's as easy as backporting the change to libgdata and then re-building evolution-data-server against it and everything will start working.

[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775813
[2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775699

Comment 1 Milan Crha 2017-03-07 14:31:05 UTC
Just in case, this change had been released within libgdata 0.17.7, but I've no idea whether any other public API/ABI had been removed/modified due to other changes in that release.

Comment 2 Debarshi Ray 2017-03-08 15:58:51 UTC
libgdata-0.17.7 has the same soname as libgdata-0.17.1 - libgdata.so.22. Hence good to go in RHEL 7.4.

Comment 3 Debarshi Ray 2017-03-08 16:33:50 UTC
I have built libgdata-0.17.7-1.el7:
https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=12716251

Comment 5 Matěj Cepl 2017-05-25 19:49:55 UTC
Sanity only, we will find out during the testing whether something got horribly broken.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 10:00:10 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2310


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.