Bug 1427399 - [RFE] capture portmap details in glusterd's statedump
Summary: [RFE] capture portmap details in glusterd's statedump
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: glusterd
Version: 3.10
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Atin Mukherjee
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1426948
Blocks: 1426950
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-02-28 05:58 UTC by Atin Mukherjee
Modified: 2017-04-05 00:01 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.10.1
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1426948
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-04-05 00:01:42 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Atin Mukherjee 2017-02-28 05:58:03 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1426948 +++

Description of problem:

capture portmap details in glusterd's statedump. This would be quite useful while debugging stale ports issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mainline

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-02-26 12:38:01 EST ---

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16764 (glusterd: add portmap details in glusterd statedump) posted (#1) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj)

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-02-27 08:47:57 EST ---

COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/16764 committed in master by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj) 
------
commit dbdfe6c353060b7af7b4250c8d6c30ed0c35783c
Author: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj>
Date:   Sun Feb 26 23:00:21 2017 +0530

    glusterd: add portmap details in glusterd statedump
    
    glusterd statedump file doesn't have information on the ports and its
    associated brick details. This is quite problematic if any setup ends up
    with stale ports and the only way to find the issue out is to gdb into
    the process which is always not available. This patch attempts to fill
    in this gap.
    
    Change-Id: I26b4fe753d752366ddf865ca3eeae3b4d577d555
    BUG: 1426948
    Signed-off-by: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj>
    Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16764
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: Prashanth Pai <ppai>

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2017-02-28 05:59:37 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16779 (glusterd: add portmap details in glusterd statedump) posted (#1) for review on release-3.10 by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj)

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2017-03-03 15:13:09 UTC
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/16779 committed in release-3.10 by Shyamsundar Ranganathan (srangana) 
------
commit 9b95b1e82fa722d92ef1259495fce386833e6f15
Author: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj>
Date:   Sun Feb 26 23:00:21 2017 +0530

    glusterd: add portmap details in glusterd statedump
    
    glusterd statedump file doesn't have information on the ports and its
    associated brick details. This is quite problematic if any setup ends up
    with stale ports and the only way to find the issue out is to gdb into
    the process which is always not available. This patch attempts to fill
    in this gap.
    
    >Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16764
    >Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    >NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    >CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    >Reviewed-by: Prashanth Pai <ppai>
    >(cherry picked from commit dbdfe6c353060b7af7b4250c8d6c30ed0c35783c)
    
    Change-Id: I26b4fe753d752366ddf865ca3eeae3b4d577d555
    BUG: 1427399
    Signed-off-by: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj>
    Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16779
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: Prashanth Pai <ppai>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>

Comment 3 Shyamsundar 2017-04-05 00:01:42 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.10.1, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.10.1 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-April/030494.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.