Bug 142802 - CVE-2005-0176 unlock someone elses ipc memory
Summary: CVE-2005-0176 unlock someone elses ipc memory
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 3.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dave Anderson
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard: public=20041124,impact=moderate
Depends On:
Blocks: 156320
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-12-14 09:42 UTC by Mark J. Cox
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-25 16:42:36 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2005:472 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: kernel security update 2005-05-25 04:00:00 UTC

Description Mark J. Cox 2004-12-14 15:34:34 UTC
Reported on lkml a flaw that allows you to unlock someone
elses ipc memory (hence crossing permission boundary).

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110132782610477
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110137276318105

"In 2.6.8, the only processes that could lock shared memory segments
were those with CAP_IPC_LOCK.  Unprivileged processes did not get a
look in."

Looks like this is 2.6.9 (Arjan says since the fixed rhel3 mlock stuff
got merged it might be there too)

Comment 2 Ernie Petrides 2005-04-21 03:20:27 UTC
A fix for this problem has just been committed to the RHEL3 U6
patch pool this evening (in kernel version 2.4.21-32.1.EL).


Comment 5 Ernie Petrides 2005-05-17 22:11:33 UTC
A fix for this problem has also been committed to the RHEL3 E6
patch pool this evening (in kernel version 2.4.21-32.0.1.EL).


Comment 6 Josh Bressers 2005-05-25 16:42:36 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-472.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.