Bug 1429629 - Searching for future dates by day is not relative to today
Summary: Searching for future dates by day is not relative to today
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Search
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Tom McKay
QA Contact: Peter Ondrejka
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-03-06 17:38 UTC by Tom McKay
Modified: 2018-09-04 17:46 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-04 17:46:31 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
screenshot1 (19.46 KB, image/png)
2017-08-24 14:44 UTC, Peter Ondrejka
no flags Details
screenshot2 (28.14 KB, image/png)
2017-08-24 14:44 UTC, Peter Ondrejka
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Foreman Issue Tracker 18811 0 None None None 2017-03-06 17:38:54 UTC

Description Tom McKay 2017-03-06 17:38:52 UTC
Today is: 2017-03-06 (day 65)
Database record is: 2017-06-19 (day 170)

Search success: expires < "172 days"
Search zero results: expires < "171 days"
Search zero results: expires < "Today + 175 days"

As a user, my expectation is that date searches are relative to today. Trying "Today +" syntax also yields zero results.

https://github.com/wvanbergen/scoped_search/issues/162

Comment 1 Tom McKay 2017-03-06 17:38:57 UTC
Created from redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/18811

Comment 2 Tom McKay 2017-03-06 17:40:50 UTC
Needed for proper future-dated subscription search in Sat-6.3

Comment 4 Satellite Program 2017-03-22 20:05:53 UTC
Upstream bug assigned to tomckay

Comment 5 Satellite Program 2017-03-22 20:05:56 UTC
Upstream bug assigned to tomckay

Comment 6 Satellite Program 2017-03-29 20:06:09 UTC
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/18811 has been resolved.

Comment 7 Peter Ondrejka 2017-08-24 14:43:05 UTC
Tested on job invocations, successfully tried several relative future queries, e.g. see screenshot 1. The problem is with the interactive hint that does not communicate that the query needs to be enclosed in quotes in order to work, see screenshot2.

Comment 8 Peter Ondrejka 2017-08-24 14:44:07 UTC
Created attachment 1317742 [details]
screenshot1

Comment 9 Peter Ondrejka 2017-08-24 14:44:43 UTC
Created attachment 1317743 [details]
screenshot2

Comment 10 Bryan Kearney 2018-09-04 17:46:31 UTC
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.