Bug 1429653 – [RFE] Update vSphere OVA settings (SCSI controller, NIC adaptor and hardware version)

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 1429653 - [RFE] Update vSphere OVA settings (SCSI controller, NIC adaptor and hardware version)

Summary:	[RFE] Update vSphere OVA settings (SCSI controller, NIC adaptor and hardware ...

Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	Build (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	5.7.0
Hardware:	Unspecified Unspecified

Priority	high Severity high
Target Milestone:	GA
Target Release:	5.10.0
Assigned To:	Satoe Imaishi
QA Contact:	Tasos Papaioannou
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	FutureFeature, RFE, TestOnly

Depends On:
Blocks:	1555371 1537303
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2017-03-06 14:03 EST by Saif Ali
Modified:	2018-09-26 10:34 EDT (History)
CC List:	10 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:	5.10.0.0
Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1537303 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-06-21 16:46:52 EDT
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	CFME Core

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Fusion Fail (121.35 KB, image/png) 2018-01-10 08:06 EST, John Hardy	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Saif Ali 2017-03-06 14:03:04 EST

Description of problem:
Change CloudForms OVA for VMWARE SCSI controller from LSI to Para Virtual

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 14 John Hardy 2018-01-10 08:06 EST

Created attachment 1379527 [details]
Fusion Fail

Comment 18 Jason Frey 2018-01-16 10:31:01 EST

Looking at the decisions as listed by Satoe, I think they are backwards.  If paravirtual is the "newer" format that we will use moving forward, that one should be the one named cfme-vsphere, and the "legacy" one should be named cfme-vsphere-lsilogic.

John, was there a specific reason you wanted them the other way around?
Oleg, thoughts?

Comment 20 Satoe Imaishi 2018-01-16 11:38:07 EST

To clarify... the difference between the 2 images is not new configuration and old configuration.  The only difference is what scsi controller to use (pvscsi or lsilogic).

What was brought up in discussion before was to use "cfme-vsphere" and "cfme-vsphere-lsilogic" (same as What Jason mentioned).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.