Bug 1429935 - [RFE] Report storage domains files information
Summary: [RFE] Report storage domains files information
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: ovirt-engine
Classification: oVirt
Component: RFEs
Version: 4.1.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Rob Young
QA Contact: Gil Klein
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1208639
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-03-07 14:25 UTC by Moti Asayag
Modified: 2022-03-10 17:10 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-05-16 10:20:22 UTC
oVirt Team: Storage
Embargoed:
sbonazzo: ovirt-4.4-


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHV-45074 0 None None None 2022-03-10 17:10:31 UTC

Description Moti Asayag 2017-03-07 14:25:53 UTC
In order to perform smart-state-analysis by ManageIQ for RHV storage domains, RHV should define a Restful API to provide the required information.

For each storage domain (including ISO and EXPORT where relevant) the following information is required:
1. VM Provisioned disk files
2. VM Snapshot files
3. VM Memory files
4. Other VM files
5. Non VM files

For each file, the following attributes are required:
1. Name (including suffix)
2. Size
3. mtime
4. type (file/dir)
5. Base name
6. Extension name
7. Storage ID
8. VM or Templates IDS to which the disk belongs.

Comment 1 Yaniv Kaul 2017-03-12 14:54:36 UTC
Is this a bug? RFE?
Severity?

Comment 2 Moti Asayag 2017-03-12 15:38:13 UTC
(In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #1)
> Is this a bug? RFE?
> Severity?

I marked this as RFE. 

Currently, the lack of this functionality prevents RHV from providing the information required by the data-store smart-state-analysis of CloudForms.

With the existing restapi collection: ovirt-engine/api/storagedomains/{id}/disks we can provide only partial of the information for the data/export storage domains.

With that in mind, I'd mark this as MEDIUM, and let the PM decide if it should get a higher severity, based on the necessity of this feature for RHV.

Comment 3 Moran Goldboim 2017-03-21 11:46:26 UTC
Targeted to 4.2 with high priority, to enable support on SSA. please let me know if storage group sees issues with it.

Comment 6 Allon Mureinik 2017-11-29 12:06:20 UTC
The internals of a storage domain aren't a public API, and I don't see us ever exposing them as such.

Not to mention the fact that discussing files is just wrong in this context.

Comment 10 Doron Fediuck 2018-05-16 10:20:22 UTC
Closing old RFEs.
If needed, please reopen and explain why.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.