Hide Forgot
Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/molequeue/molequeue.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/avogadro2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00525214-molequeue/molequeue-0.8.0-1.20161222giteb397e.fc27.src.rpm Description: MoleQueue is an open-source, cross-platform, system-tray resident desktop application for abstracting, managing, and coordinating the execution of tasks both locally and on remote computational resources. Users can set up local and remote queues that describe where the task will be executed. Each queue can have programs, with templates to facilitate the execution of the program. Input files can be staged, and output files collected using a standard interface. Some highlights: * Open source distributed under the liberal 3-clause BSD license * Cross platform with nightly builds on Linux, Mac OS X and Windows * Intuitive interface designed to be useful to whole community * Support for local executation and remote schedulers (SGE, PBS, SLURM) * System tray resident application managing queue of queues and job lifetime * Simple, lightweight JSON-RPC 2.0 based communication over local sockets * Qt 5 client library for simple integration in Qt applications Fedora Account System Username: sagitter
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages Hm, upstream has unversioned libraries. So all users will have to be rebuilt in sync. It would be nice talk with upstream why this is a bad idea. Nothing you can do downstream though [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg01155.html]. You should run ldconfig scriptlets anyway, I think [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#Shared_libraries]. Why not python3? Ah, OK, the code does not seem to be python3 compatible. Too bad. .tar.gz would be preferable to .zip, they're 30% smaller usually. This is a graphical application, it would be nice to add an appdata file https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AppData, and a desktop file. Especially the desktop file is important so that people can launch this without going to the console. This is a specialized application, so the appdata can be missing. + package name is OK + license is OK (BSD 3-clause) + license is specified correctly + builds and installs OK - scriptlets are missing (see above) + buildrequires, provides, requires look correct Looks good otherwise.
%build cat >molequeue.desktop <<EOF [Desktop Entry] Name=HPC queuing system Exec=molequeue Terminal=false Type=Application Icon=molequeue EOF convert molequeue/app/icons/molequeue.ico molequeue/app/icons/molequeue.png %install for i in molequeue/app/icons/molequeue-*.png; do size="$(identify $i|cut -d' ' -f3)" echo install -Dpm0644 $i %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$size/apps/molequeue.png done desktop-file-install --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/ molequeue.desktop
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1) > > You should run ldconfig scriptlets anyway, I think > [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#Shared_libraries]. I have fully ignored the 'ldscripts' in these rpms. Scatterbrained.
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1) > - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages > Hm, upstream has unversioned libraries. So all users will have to be rebuilt > in sync. It would be nice talk with upstream why this is a bad idea. Nothing > you can do downstream though > [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg01155.html]. > Asked to upstream: https://github.com/OpenChemistry/molequeue/issues/17 Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/molequeue/molequeue.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/avogadro2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00528416-molequeue/molequeue-0.8.0-2.20161222giteb397e.fc27.src.rpm
Duh, I thought we got rid of those terrible icon cache scriptlets, but apparently they are still required. + package name is OK + license is OK (BSD 3-clause) + license is specified correctly + builds and installs OK + scriptlets are OK + buildrequires, provides, requires look correct One issue, my fault: in the .desktop file: -Name=HPC queuing system +Name=MoleQueue +Comment=Manage HPC jobs from the system tray (Name is displayed in search, and the text was too generic.) Package is APPROVED.
(I didn't check actual functionality, because I don't have the necessary setup, but the app seems to be functional.)
Thank you. Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/molequeue/molequeue.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/avogadro2/fedora-25-x86_64/00528765-molequeue/molequeue-0.8.0-2.20161222giteb397e.fc25.src.rpm
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/molequeue
molequeue-0.8.0-2.20161222giteb397e.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-833b73f0b0
molequeue-0.8.0-2.20161222giteb397e.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c1b32a53bd
molequeue-0.8.0-2.20161222giteb397e.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-833b73f0b0
molequeue-0.8.0-2.20161222giteb397e.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c1b32a53bd
molequeue-0.8.0-2.20161222giteb397e.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
molequeue-0.8.0-2.20161222giteb397e.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.