Bug 1434003 - Review Request: tilix - Tiling terminal emulator
Summary: Review Request: tilix - Tiling terminal emulator
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-03-20 14:11 UTC by Kalev Lember
Modified: 2017-04-01 17:20 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-04-01 17:20:16 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
licensecheck output for tilix (7.15 KB, text/plain)
2017-03-20 18:29 UTC, Neal Gompa
no flags Details

Description Kalev Lember 2017-03-20 14:11:55 UTC
Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/tilix.spec
SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/tilix-1.5.4-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description:
Tilix is a tiling terminal emulator with the following features:

 - Layout terminals in any fashion by splitting them horizontally or vertically
 - Terminals can be re-arranged using drag and drop both within and between
   windows
 - Terminals can be detached into a new window via drag and drop
 - Input can be synchronized between terminals so commands typed in one
   terminal are replicated to the others
 - The grouping of terminals can be saved and loaded from disk
 - Terminals support custom titles
 - Color schemes are stored in files and custom color schemes can be created by
   simply creating a new file
 - Transparent background
 - Supports notifications when processes are completed out of view

The application was written using GTK 3 and an effort was made to conform to
GNOME Human Interface Guidelines (HIG).

Fedora Account System Username: kalev

Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18489998

Comment 1 Kalev Lember 2017-03-20 15:32:23 UTC
* Mon Mar 20 2017 Kalev Lember <klember> - 1.5.4-2
- Use _d_optflags and disable debug print to stderr

Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/tilix.spec
SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/tilix-1.5.4-1.fc26.src.rpm

Comment 2 Gerald Nunn 2017-03-20 15:55:01 UTC
I'm the author of Tilix and I've subscribed to this. If there are any questions or issues that need resolving in the application to make this happen just let me know.

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2017-03-20 17:32:18 UTC
Taking this review.

Comment 4 Neal Gompa 2017-03-20 17:34:47 UTC
@Kalev,

Your SRPM and spec don't match.

Comment 5 Kalev Lember 2017-03-20 17:40:05 UTC
Sorry, I typoed the SRPM link above.

Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/tilix.spec
SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/tilix-1.5.4-2.fc26.src.rpm

Comment 6 Neal Gompa 2017-03-20 18:29:26 UTC
Created attachment 1264822 [details]
licensecheck output for tilix

Some issues encountered by fedora-review:

[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "*No copyright* CC
     by-sa (v3.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* MPL (v2.0)",
     "MPL (v2.0)". 126 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/makerpm/1434003-tilix/licensecheck.txt

Please verify with upstream that the licensing is sane. licensecheck output attached to this bug.

[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/share/metainfo

Until we migrate from /usr/share/appdata to /usr/share/metainfo completely (tooling, dependency generators, etc.), please move metainfo/appdata files to /usr/share/appdata.

[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners:
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps, /usr/share/metainfo,
     /usr/share/dbus-1/services, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/256x256/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps, /usr/share/dbus-1,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/512x512/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22,
     /usr/share/glib-2.0, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/512x512,
     /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/256x256, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable

The hicolor dir ownership can be fixed with Req on hicolor-icon-theme. The dbus dir ownership can be fixed with Req on dbus, I believe. The glib-2.0 dirs issue can probably be fixed by Req glib2, though that should be happening already...

Comment 7 Kalev Lember 2017-03-20 19:11:11 UTC
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #6)
> Created attachment 1264822 [details]
> licensecheck output for tilix
> 
> Some issues encountered by fedora-review:
> 
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>      Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
>      found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "*No copyright* CC
>      by-sa (v3.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* MPL (v2.0)",
>      "MPL (v2.0)". 126 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
>      licensecheck in /home/makerpm/1434003-tilix/licensecheck.txt
> 
> Please verify with upstream that the licensing is sane. licensecheck output
> attached to this bug.

Thanks. I've updated the licensing breakdown, which now reads:

# The tilix source code is MPLv2.0,
# source/gx/gtk/x11.d is GPLv2+,
# source/secret is LGPLv3+,
# source/x11 and com.gexperts.Tilix.gschema.xml are GPLv3+,
# icons are CC-BY-SA.
# This makes the combined license: 
License:        MPLv2.0 and GPLv3+ and CC-BY-SA

> [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
>      Note: No known owner of /usr/share/metainfo
> 
> Until we migrate from /usr/share/appdata to /usr/share/metainfo completely
> (tooling, dependency generators, etc.), please move metainfo/appdata files
> to /usr/share/appdata.

Putting appdata files in that directory is completely fine. I just recently fixed the appstream generator to work with /usr/share/metainfo. As for the directory ownership, this belongs to the filesystem package. I've already filed a filesystem ticket earlier today to add it, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434008


> [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
>      Note: Directories without known owners:
>      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps,
>      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps, /usr/share/metainfo,
>      /usr/share/dbus-1/services, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24,
>      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/256x256/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16,
>      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps,
>      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor,
>      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps, /usr/share/dbus-1,
>      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/512x512/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32,
>      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22,
>      /usr/share/glib-2.0, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/512x512,
>      /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48,
>      /usr/share/icons/hicolor/256x256, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable
> 
> The hicolor dir ownership can be fixed with Req on hicolor-icon-theme. The
> dbus dir ownership can be fixed with Req on dbus, I believe. The glib-2.0
> dirs issue can probably be fixed by Req glib2, though that should be
> happening already...

Thanks, I've added explicit dbus and hicolor-icon-theme deps. glib2 is definitely pulled in via dependencies and there's no need to add it.

* Mon Mar 20 2017 Kalev Lember <klember> - 1.5.4-3
- Update licensing breakdown (#1434003)
- Add explicit dbus and hicolor-icon-theme deps for directory ownership

Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/tilix.spec
SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/tilix-1.5.4-3.fc26.src.rpm

Comment 8 Neal Gompa 2017-03-20 19:30:09 UTC
Can you get upstream to include license files for all licenses that the project is covered under?

Comment 9 Kalev Lember 2017-03-20 19:32:53 UTC
Probably, but this shouldn't be a blocker for the package review.

Comment 10 Kalev Lember 2017-03-20 19:39:33 UTC
I've updated the spec file to make sure all the license files that upstream ships are included.

* Mon Mar 20 2017 Kalev Lember <klember> - 1.5.4-4
- Include data/icons/LICENSE and source/x11/LICENSE as %%license (#1434003)

Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/tilix.spec
SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/tilix-1.5.4-4.fc26.src.rpm

Comment 11 Neal Gompa 2017-03-20 19:42:46 UTC
Actually, it appears that glib2 isn't pulled in by *any* dependencies, so it needs to be added as a Requires. It's also needed to ensure the file trigger fires.

Comment 12 Kalev Lember 2017-03-20 19:44:17 UTC
It most definitely gets pulled in. Something like tilix->gtkd->gtk3->glib2 dep chain or so.

Comment 13 Neal Gompa 2017-03-20 20:00:15 UTC
Hmm, if you're sure... Aside from this and the metainfo thing, fedora-review and rpmlint are happy, so...

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 14 Kalev Lember 2017-03-20 20:01:16 UTC
Excellent. Thank you for the quick review, Neal!

Comment 15 Gwyn Ciesla 2017-03-20 21:50:38 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/tilix

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2017-03-21 07:07:14 UTC
tilix-1.5.4-4.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2e32be8694

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2017-03-21 14:26:28 UTC
tilix-1.5.4-4.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2e32be8694

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2017-04-01 17:20:16 UTC
tilix-1.5.4-4.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.