+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1435943 +++ Description of problem: Test case ./tests/bugs/bug-1110262.t fails on enabling parallel readdir Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: --- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-03-25 22:38:25 EDT --- REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16948 (protocol-client: Initialize the list_head before using) posted (#1) for review on master by Poornima G (pgurusid)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16949 (protocol-client: Initialize the list_head before using) posted (#1) for review on release-3.10 by Poornima G (pgurusid)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16949 (protocol-client: Initialize the list_head before using) posted (#2) for review on release-3.10 by Poornima G (pgurusid)
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/16949 committed in release-3.10 by Shyamsundar Ranganathan (srangana) ------ commit bbe96394337446364af235cf40293bf596072ace Author: Poornima G <pgurusid> Date: Sun Mar 26 07:59:53 2017 +0530 protocol-client: Initialize the list_head before using In client3_3_readdir(p)_cbk, in case of error conditions, it is possible that the list_head is used before initializing. Hence move the initialization before usage. >Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16948 >Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> >NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> >CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> >Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp> Change-Id: Ie58902d079fdc58416d17b5fa5f61375decb1c99 BUG: 1435946 Signed-off-by: Poornima G <pgurusid> Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16949 NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.10.1, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.10.1 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-April/030494.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/