Bug 1436709 - [Doc RFE] Document the Negative lookup cache feature
Summary: [Doc RFE] Document the Negative lookup cache feature
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: doc-Administration_Guide
Version: rhgs-3.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.3.0
Assignee: Bhavana
QA Contact: Vivek Das
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1427099
Blocks: 1417156
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-03-28 13:21 UTC by Anjana Suparna Sriram
Modified: 2017-09-21 04:29 UTC (History)
15 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1427099
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-09-21 04:29:43 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 3 Poornima G 2017-05-18 09:33:53 UTC
The doc looks good

Comment 4 Bhavana 2017-05-18 09:38:42 UTC
Thanks Poornima.

Moving the bug to ON_QA.

Comment 5 Poornima G 2017-06-19 10:19:25 UTC
There is small change required for this section:

The following text :
====================
 Execute the following commands to enable negative-lookup cache:

    To enable cache invalidation and increase the timeout to 10 minutes execute the following commands:

    # gluster volume set <volname> features.cache-invalidation on

    volume set success

    # gluster volume set <volname> features.cache-invalidation-timeout 600

    volume set success

    To enable negative-lookup cache execute the following command:

    # gluster volume set <VOLNAME> nl-cache on
    volume set success

    Note
    By default the cache time is 10 minutes. It is recommended to retain the default value. 


Should be changed to:
====================
 Execute the following commands to enable negative-lookup cache:

    To enable negative-lookup execute the following commands:

    # gluster volume set <volname> group nl-cache

    volume set success

    The above command also enabled cache-invalidation and increase the timeout to 10 minutes

Comment 7 Vivek Das 2017-08-08 15:51:40 UTC
Looks good to me. Marking it as Verified.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.