Bug 1436797 - python-oslo-rootwrap: python3-oslo-rootwrap is missing Python 3 version of executables
Summary: python-oslo-rootwrap: python3-oslo-rootwrap is missing Python 3 version of ex...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-oslo-rootwrap
Version: 27
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthias Runge
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: PY3-EXECUTABLES
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-03-28 17:27 UTC by Iryna Shcherbina
Modified: 2018-11-30 23:16 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-11-30 23:16:55 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
New release with Python 3 version of executables (5.62 KB, patch)
2017-05-17 14:59 UTC, Jan Beran
no flags Details | Diff
Updated Python3 spec file (5.62 KB, patch)
2017-06-30 12:54 UTC, Jan Beran
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1634603 0 unspecified CLOSED python-oslo-rootwrap: Remove (sub)packages from Fedora 30+: python2-oslo-rootwrap, python2-oslo-rootwrap-tests 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1634603

Description Iryna Shcherbina 2017-03-28 17:27:26 UTC
The Python 3 subpackage python3-oslo-rootwrap is missing executables available in the Python 2 subpackage.

According to the Fedora Packaging guidelines for Python [0], if a Python package that supports Python 3 installs executables into /usr/bin,  then either both Python versions of the executables should be packaged, or only the Python 3 version, depending on the functionality they provide.
(Note the "should": having Python 2-only executables is permitted, but strongly discouraged.)

Is it intentional for this particular package?

In case it is not intentional, please provide a Python 3 version of executable, or you can just switch to Python 3 if the functionality is the same regardless of the Python version. The guide for porting Python-based RPMs is available here [1] and you may refer to it for more instructions.

It's ok to do this in Rawhide only, however, it would be greatly
appreciated if you could push it to Fedora 26 as well.

If anything is unclear, or if you need any kind of assistance, you can
ask on IRC (#fedora-python on Freenode), or reply here. We'll be happy
to help investigating or fixing the issue!

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Avoiding_collisions_between_the_python_2_and_python_3_stacks
[1] http://python-rpm-porting.readthedocs.io/

Comment 1 Jan Beran 2017-05-17 14:59:39 UTC
Created attachment 1279743 [details]
New release with Python 3 version of executables

Comment 2 Jan Beran 2017-06-30 11:35:07 UTC
Hi Matthias, please could you review the updated spec file?

Thank you.

Jan

Comment 3 Matthias Runge 2017-06-30 12:27:20 UTC
The description for py3 version needs to be adjusted, since there is the binary referenced.

Comment 4 Jan Beran 2017-06-30 12:54:39 UTC
Created attachment 1293220 [details]
Updated Python3 spec file

Hi Matthias,

thanks for your review. I have fixed the description. Please could you check again, and if the spec file is fine then proceed further?

Thank you.

Jan

Comment 5 Matthias Runge 2017-07-01 06:34:27 UTC
This looks good.

Comment 6 Jan Beran 2017-07-21 12:55:05 UTC
Hi Alan,

according to you comment at [1], I suppose that this package will also be retired from Fedora, right?

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336361#c6

Comment 7 Alan Pevec 2017-07-21 16:44:53 UTC
yes

Comment 8 Alan Pevec 2017-07-23 22:51:12 UTC
BTW for OpenStack packages, please submit .spec changes in RDO project Gerrit: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/

Comment 9 Jan Kurik 2017-08-15 08:28:25 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 27 development cycle.
Changing version to '27'.

Comment 10 Ben Cotton 2018-11-27 13:59:09 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 27 is nearing its end of life.
On 2018-Nov-30  Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for
Fedora 27. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases
that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as
EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version' of '27'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 27 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 11 Ben Cotton 2018-11-30 23:16:55 UTC
Fedora 27 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-11-30. Fedora 27 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.