Bug 1437986 - Review Request: python-pyaes - Pure-Python implementation of AES block-cipher and common modes of operation
Summary: Review Request: python-pyaes - Pure-Python implementation of AES block-cipher...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Othman Madjoudj
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1440717
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-03-31 15:01 UTC by Peter Lemenkov
Modified: 2017-04-12 20:23 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-04-09 16:41:56 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
athmanem: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Peter Lemenkov 2017-03-31 15:01:53 UTC
Spec URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-pyaes.spec
SRPM URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-pyaes-1.6.0-1.fc25.src.rpm
Description: A pure-Python implmentation of the AES block cipher algorithm and the common modes of operation (CBC, CFB, CTR, ECB and OFB).
Fedora Account System Username: peter

Koji scratch build:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18698657

This package is a requirement for Electrum 2.8.0 and later and Electrum-LTC (not yet packaged).

Comment 1 Othman Madjoudj 2017-04-01 13:49:23 UTC
Hi Peter, 

I'll review this, could you in exchange review #1421304 (trivial), I need it to update GNS3

Comment 2 Othman Madjoudj 2017-04-01 15:48:24 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

===== Summary =====

Package approved, please fix mixed space and tab in the spec.

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[?]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python2-pyaes-1.6.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm
          python3-pyaes-1.6.0-1.fc25.noarch.rpm
          python-pyaes-1.6.0-1.fc25.src.rpm
python2-pyaes.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US implmentation -> implementation, implantation, supplementation
python3-pyaes.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US implmentation -> implementation, implantation, supplementation
python-pyaes.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US implmentation -> implementation, implantation, supplementation
python-pyaes.src:5: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 5)
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
python2-pyaes.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US implmentation -> implementation, implantation, supplementation
python3-pyaes.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US implmentation -> implementation, implantation, supplementation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.



Requires
--------
python2-pyaes (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)

python3-pyaes (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)



Provides
--------
python2-pyaes:
    python-pyaes
    python2-pyaes
    python2.7dist(pyaes)
    python2dist(pyaes)

python3-pyaes:
    python3-pyaes
    python3.5dist(pyaes)
    python3dist(pyaes)



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/ricmoo/pyaes/archive/v1.6.0/python-pyaes-1.6.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 69fb7517bcb8d834d521e31bca671456bd6de87cdf2c338171a48dedebbcf42e
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 69fb7517bcb8d834d521e31bca671456bd6de87cdf2c338171a48dedebbcf42e

Comment 3 Peter Lemenkov 2017-04-04 14:11:38 UTC
(In reply to Athmane Madjoudj from comment #2)
> Package Review
> ==============
...
> ===== Summary =====
> 
> Package approved, please fix mixed space and tab in the spec.


Thanks! I'll fix spaces and spelling before uploading.

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2017-04-04 14:36:54 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pyaes

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2017-04-04 15:05:39 UTC
python-pyaes-1.6.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-168caf5512

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2017-04-04 15:05:48 UTC
python-pyaes-1.6.0-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-df3a65f201

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2017-04-04 22:23:39 UTC
python-pyaes-1.6.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-df3a65f201

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2017-04-04 23:53:23 UTC
python-pyaes-1.6.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-168caf5512

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2017-04-09 16:41:56 UTC
python-pyaes-1.6.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2017-04-12 20:23:19 UTC
python-pyaes-1.6.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.