Problem: local->loc.gfid in dht_lookup_directory() will be null-gfid for a fresh lookup. dht_lookup_dir_cbk() updates local->loc.gfid while in other thread dht_lookup_directory() is still winding lookup calls to subvolumes so there is a chance of partial gfid being seen by EC. We saw in 12x(4+2) volume, ec is receiving an loc where the gfid has last 12 bytes matching with the gfid of the directory and the first 4 bytes are all-zeros. This is leading to EC erroring out the lookup with EINVAL which leads to NFS failing lookup with EIO. snip from gdb: $37 = (dht_local_t *) 0x7fde5de5b3cc (gdb) p /x $37->loc.gfid $39 = {0x3b, 0x82, 0x10, 0x5e, 0x40, 0x65, 0x43, 0x14, 0xa0, 0xc6, 0x8, 0xf5, 0x6c, 0x2c, 0xb8, 0x56} (gdb) fr 7 state=<optimized out>) at ec-generic.c:837 837 ec_lookup_rebuild(fop->xl->private, fop, cbk); (gdb) p /x fop->loc[0].gfid $40 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x43, 0x14, 0xa0, 0xc6, 0x8, 0xf5, 0x6c, 0x2c, 0xb8, 0x56} snip from log: [2017-01-29 03:22:30.132328] W [MSGID: 122019] [ec-helpers.c:354:ec_loc_gfid_check] 0-butcher-disperse-4: Mismatching GFID's in loc [2017-01-29 03:22:30.132709] W [MSGID: 112199] [nfs3-helpers.c:3515:nfs3_log_newfh_res] 0-nfs-nfsv3: /linux-4.9.5/Documentation => (XID: b27b9474, MKDIR: NFS: 5(I/O error), POSIX: 5(Input/output error)), FH: exportid 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, gfid 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, mountid 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 [Invalid argument] Fix: update local->loc.gfid in last-call to make sure there are no races.
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16988 (cluster/dht: Modify local->loc.gfid in thread safe manner) posted (#1) for review on release-3.8 by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu)
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/16988 committed in release-3.8 by Niels de Vos (ndevos) ------ commit a01d6f460c09c67f647aa529fc38a229e8461d4e Author: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu> Date: Thu Mar 30 14:58:38 2017 +0530 cluster/dht: Modify local->loc.gfid in thread safe manner Backport of https://review.gluster.org/16986 Problem: local->loc.gfid in dht_lookup_directory() will be null-gfid for a fresh lookup. dht_lookup_dir_cbk() updates local->loc.gfid while in other thread dht_lookup_directory() is still winding lookup calls to subvolumes so there is a chance of partial gfid being seen by EC. We saw in 12x(4+2) volume, ec is receiving an loc where the gfid has last 10 bytes matching with the gfid of the directory and the first 4 bytes are all-zeros. This is leading to EC erroring out the lookup with EINVAL which leads to NFS failing lookup with EIO. snip from gdb: $37 = (dht_local_t *) 0x7fde5de5b3cc (gdb) p /x $37->loc.gfid $39 = {0x3b, 0x82, 0x10, 0x5e, 0x40, 0x65, 0x43, 0x14, 0xa0, 0xc6, 0x8, 0xf5, 0x6c, 0x2c, 0xb8, 0x56} (gdb) fr 7 state=<optimized out>) at ec-generic.c:837 837 ec_lookup_rebuild(fop->xl->private, fop, cbk); (gdb) p /x fop->loc[0].gfid $40 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x43, 0x14, 0xa0, 0xc6, 0x8, 0xf5, 0x6c, 0x2c, 0xb8, 0x56} snip from log: [2017-01-29 03:22:30.132328] W [MSGID: 122019] [ec-helpers.c:354:ec_loc_gfid_check] 0-butcher-disperse-4: Mismatching GFID's in loc [2017-01-29 03:22:30.132709] W [MSGID: 112199] [nfs3-helpers.c:3515:nfs3_log_newfh_res] 0-nfs-nfsv3: /linux-4.9.5/Documentation => (XID: b27b9474, MKDIR: NFS: 5(I/O error), POSIX: 5(Input/output error)), FH: exportid 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, gfid 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, mountid 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 [Invalid argument] Fix: update local->loc.gfid in last-call to make sure there are no races. >BUG: 1438411 >Change-Id: Ifcb7e911568c1f1f83123da6ff0cf742b91800a0 >Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu> BUG: 1438424 Change-Id: If039956205cfac5e798c2c90e92a9a47b404e804 Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu> Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16988 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.8.11, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.8.11 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/2017-April/000289.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/