Bug 1439692 - Unable to determine the correct call signature for deleteluns
Summary: Unable to determine the correct call signature for deleteluns
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: ovirt-engine
Classification: oVirt
Component: BLL.Storage
Version: 4.1.1.8
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ovirt-4.1.3
: 4.1.3
Assignee: Idan Shaby
QA Contact: Elad
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-04-06 12:07 UTC by Kapetanakis Giannis
Modified: 2017-07-06 13:36 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-07-06 13:36:00 UTC
oVirt Team: Storage
Embargoed:
rule-engine: ovirt-4.1+
amureini: devel_ack+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
engine.log (865.23 KB, text/plain)
2017-05-08 11:40 UTC, Elad
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
oVirt gerrit 75302 0 master MERGED core: Fix LunDao#removeAll 2017-04-06 14:07:06 UTC
oVirt gerrit 75307 0 ovirt-engine-4.1 MERGED core: Fix LunDao#removeAll 2017-04-07 07:44:37 UTC
oVirt gerrit 76870 0 master MERGED backend: refactor SyncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomainCommand 2017-05-21 13:24:56 UTC
oVirt gerrit 76871 0 master MERGED backend: remove old luns from db on sd sync 2017-05-21 13:25:00 UTC
oVirt gerrit 77073 0 ovirt-engine-4.1 MERGED backend: refactor SyncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomainCommand 2017-05-22 10:01:15 UTC
oVirt gerrit 77074 0 ovirt-engine-4.1 MERGED backend: remove old luns from db on sd sync 2017-05-22 10:01:10 UTC

Description Kapetanakis Giannis 2017-04-06 12:07:39 UTC
I've just updated to 4.1.1.8 async release

However this error exists in 4.1.0 release as well:

2017-04-06 14:59:57,141+03 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.domain.SyncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomainCommand] (org.ovirt.thread.pool-6-thread-19) [f584873] Command 'org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.domain.SyncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomainCommand' failed: Unable to determine the correct call signature - no procedure/function/signature for 'deleteluns'
2017-04-06 14:59:57,142+03 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.domain.SyncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomainCommand] (org.ovirt.thread.pool-6-thread-19) [f584873] Exception: org.springframework.dao.InvalidDataAccessApiUsageException: Unable to determine the correct call signature - no procedure/function/signature for 'deleteluns'
	at org.springframework.jdbc.core.metadata.GenericCallMetaDataProvider.processProcedureColumns(GenericCallMetaDataProvider.java:347) [spring-jdbc.jar:4.2.4.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.jdbc.core.metadata.GenericCallMetaDataProvider.initializeWithProcedureColumnMetaData(GenericCallMetaDataProvider.java:112) [spring-jdbc.jar:4.2.4.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.jdbc.core.metadata.CallMetaDataProviderFactory$1.processMetaData(CallMetaDataProviderFactory.java:133) [spring-jdbc.jar:4.2.4.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.jdbc.support.JdbcUtils.extractDatabaseMetaData(JdbcUtils.java:299) [spring-jdbc.jar:4.2.4.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.jdbc.core.metadata.CallMetaDataProviderFactory.createMetaDataProvider(CallMetaDataProviderFactory.java:73) [spring-jdbc.jar:4.2.4.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.jdbc.core.metadata.CallMetaDataContext.initializeMetaData(CallMetaDataContext.java:286) [spring-jdbc.jar:4.2.4.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.jdbc.core.simple.AbstractJdbcCall.compileInternal(AbstractJdbcCall.java:303) [spring-jdbc.jar:4.2.4.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.jdbc.core.simple.AbstractJdbcCall.compile(AbstractJdbcCall.java:288) [spring-jdbc.jar:4.2.4.RELEASE]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.SimpleJdbcCallsHandler.getCall(SimpleJdbcCallsHandler.java:157) [dal.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.SimpleJdbcCallsHandler.getCall(SimpleJdbcCallsHandler.java:150) [dal.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.BatchProcedureExecutionConnectionCallback.fillProcMetaData(BatchProcedureExecutionConnectionCallback.java:92) [dal.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.BatchProcedureExecutionConnectionCallback.getStoredProcedureMetaData(BatchProcedureExecutionConnectionCallback.java:84) [dal.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.BatchProcedureExecutionConnectionCallback.doInConnection(BatchProcedureExecutionConnectionCallback.java:51) [dal.jar:]
	at org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate.execute(JdbcTemplate.java:349) [spring-jdbc.jar:4.2.4.RELEASE]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.SimpleJdbcCallsHandler.executeStoredProcAsBatch(SimpleJdbcCallsHandler.java:58) [dal.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.SimpleJdbcCallsHandler.executeStoredProcAsBatch(SimpleJdbcCallsHandler.java:72) [dal.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.dao.MassOperationsGenericDao.removeAllInBatch(MassOperationsGenericDao.java:75) [dal.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.dao.MassOperationsGenericDao.removeAllInBatch(MassOperationsGenericDao.java:86) [dal.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.domain.SyncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomainCommand.cleanupLunsFromDb(SyncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomainCommand.java:124) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.domain.SyncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomainCommand.lambda$executeCommand$3(SyncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomainCommand.java:78) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.transaction.TransactionSupport.executeInNewTransaction(TransactionSupport.java:202) [utils.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.domain.SyncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomainCommand.executeCommand(SyncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomainCommand.java:75) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.executeWithoutTransaction(CommandBase.java:1251) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.executeActionInTransactionScope(CommandBase.java:1391) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.runInTransaction(CommandBase.java:2055) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.transaction.TransactionSupport.executeInSuppressed(TransactionSupport.java:164) [utils.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.transaction.TransactionSupport.executeInScope(TransactionSupport.java:103) [utils.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.execute(CommandBase.java:1451) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.executeAction(CommandBase.java:397) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.executor.DefaultBackendActionExecutor.execute(DefaultBackendActionExecutor.java:13) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.Backend.runAction(Backend.java:511) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.Backend.runActionImpl(Backend.java:493) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.Backend.runInternalAction(Backend.java:437) [bll.jar:]
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ManagedReferenceMethodInterceptor.processInvocation(ManagedReferenceMethodInterceptor.java:52)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext$Invocation.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:437)
	at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.delegateInterception(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:70) [wildfly-weld-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.doMethodInterception(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:80) [wildfly-weld-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.processInvocation(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:93) [wildfly-weld-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.as.ee.component.interceptors.UserInterceptorFactory$1.processInvocation(UserInterceptorFactory.java:63)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.invocationmetrics.ExecutionTimeInterceptor.processInvocation(ExecutionTimeInterceptor.java:43) [wildfly-ejb3-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext$Invocation.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:437)
	at org.jboss.weld.ejb.AbstractEJBRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.aroundInvoke(AbstractEJBRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.java:73) [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
	at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.EjbRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.processInvocation(EjbRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.java:83) [wildfly-weld-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.as.ee.concurrent.ConcurrentContextInterceptor.processInvocation(ConcurrentContextInterceptor.java:45) [wildfly-ee-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InitialInterceptor.processInvocation(InitialInterceptor.java:21)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
	at org.jboss.as.ee.component.interceptors.ComponentDispatcherInterceptor.processInvocation(ComponentDispatcherInterceptor.java:52)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.singleton.SingletonComponentInstanceAssociationInterceptor.processInvocation(SingletonComponentInstanceAssociationInterceptor.java:53) [wildfly-ejb3-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.invokeInNoTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:263) [wildfly-ejb3-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.supports(CMTTxInterceptor.java:374) [wildfly-ejb3-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.processInvocation(CMTTxInterceptor.java:243) [wildfly-ejb3-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.processInvocation(CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.java:41) [wildfly-ejb3-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.invocationmetrics.WaitTimeInterceptor.processInvocation(WaitTimeInterceptor.java:47) [wildfly-ejb3-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.SecurityContextInterceptor.processInvocation(SecurityContextInterceptor.java:100) [wildfly-ejb3-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.StartupAwaitInterceptor.processInvocation(StartupAwaitInterceptor.java:22) [wildfly-ejb3-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.ShutDownInterceptorFactory$1.processInvocation(ShutDownInterceptorFactory.java:64) [wildfly-ejb3-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.LoggingInterceptor.processInvocation(LoggingInterceptor.java:67) [wildfly-ejb3-10.1.0.Final.jar:10.1.0.Final]
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.as.ee.component.NamespaceContextInterceptor.processInvocation(NamespaceContextInterceptor.java:50)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.invocation.ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.processInvocation(ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.java:64)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
	at org.wildfly.security.manager.WildFlySecurityManager.doChecked(WildFlySecurityManager.java:636)
	at org.jboss.invocation.AccessCheckingInterceptor.processInvocation(AccessCheckingInterceptor.java:61)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
	at org.jboss.invocation.PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.processInvocation(PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.java:80)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
	at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ViewService$View.invoke(ViewService.java:198)
	at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ViewDescription$1.processInvocation(ViewDescription.java:185)
	at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
	at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
	at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ProxyInvocationHandler.invoke(ProxyInvocationHandler.java:73)
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.interfaces.BackendInternal$$$view3.runInternalAction(Unknown Source) [bll.jar:]
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.Reflections.invokeAndUnwrap(Reflections.java:433) [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
	at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.EnterpriseBeanProxyMethodHandler.invoke(EnterpriseBeanProxyMethodHandler.java:128) [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
	at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.EnterpriseTargetBeanInstance.invoke(EnterpriseTargetBeanInstance.java:56) [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
	at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.ProxyMethodHandler.invoke(ProxyMethodHandler.java:100) [weld-core-impl-2.3.5.Final.jar:2.3.5.Final]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.BackendCommandObjectsHandler$BackendInternal$BackendLocal$2049259618$Proxy$_$$_Weld$EnterpriseProxy$.runInternalAction(Unknown Source) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.VdsEventListener.lambda$syncLunsInfoForBlockStorageDomain$2(VdsEventListener.java:275) [bll.jar:]
	at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.threadpool.ThreadPoolUtil$InternalWrapperRunnable.run(ThreadPoolUtil.java:92) [utils.jar:]
	at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [rt.jar:1.8.0_121]

Comment 1 Allon Mureinik 2017-04-06 13:21:37 UTC
Looking through the code history, frankly, I'm not sure how (if?) this ever worked.
Should be a reasonably easy fix to deliver in 4.1.2 though.

Comment 2 Kapetanakis Giannis 2017-04-06 13:30:36 UTC
Is it related to bug 1403839 ?

Comment 3 Allon Mureinik 2017-04-06 13:37:19 UTC
(In reply to Kapetanakis Giannis from comment #2)
> Is it related to bug 1403839 ?

Not as far as I can tell. But perhaps Liron (who implemented that RFE) would have a different insight.
Liron?

Comment 4 Liron Aravot 2017-04-06 18:19:03 UTC
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #3)
> (In reply to Kapetanakis Giannis from comment #2)
> > Is it related to bug 1403839 ?
> 
> Not as far as I can tell. But perhaps Liron (who implemented that RFE) would
> have a different insight.
> Liron?

Hi Giannis/Aloon
This RFE isn't related to that issue - the issue is in a different flow.
I see that Allon already sent a fix, so it should be merged soon.

Regards,
Liron

Comment 5 Elad 2017-04-30 13:19:40 UTC
Allon/Liron, can you please add steps to reproduce?

Comment 6 Allon Mureinik 2017-05-04 15:04:14 UTC
To be completely honest, I worked back from the stack trace, created a DAO test and developed the fix based on that.

From reading the code, this faulty call should occur when you activate a block domain and the database has an old lun that isn't returned by getVGInfo.
I think the easiest way to simulate this is to move a block domain to maintenance and then manually insert a row to the "luns" table.

Unless Kapetanakis has a better suggestion?

Comment 7 Kapetanakis Giannis 2017-05-04 15:08:26 UTC
no suggestion from me :)

Comment 8 Elad 2017-05-07 08:14:09 UTC
Set block domain to maintenance and inserted a line to 'luns' table:

engine=# insert INTO luns values ('lun','lun','lun','lun','3','lun','lun','10','233','t');
INSERT 0 1

           physical_volume_id           |      lun_id       
----------------------------------------+-------------------
 XJRsDH-13bf-29bB-6c9G-6vMP-j3pL-CXr3XI | 3514f0c5a516004ac
 2Vlo30-ciJY-d6xf-zEVz-YYY8-sbKl-IVJWEB | 3514f0c5a516004ab
 DSbwKT-rGJu-aOma-G8lf-vg9q-Yk52-ds4TZf | 3514f0c5a516004aa
 4fpBIy-Hpxg-P0Ej-t9db-ZZt7-N4Ge-vloyaS | 3514f0c5a51600215
 L7XnOI-A5r1-B8uq-gaOH-Sgbd-ySoB-mWDbdG | 3514f0c5a51600213
 LJmZ5x-0avg-rS32-fyOw-1SdW-nLHY-m0fkQh | 3514f0c5a516004ad
 lun                                    | lun
 T3SH1U-sgQq-ItqR-wl4h-1ZpY-NJiC-VQEm0X | 3514f0c5a51600214
(8 rows)



Then, activated the domain. The LUN wasn't removed from 'luns' table.

Allon, what am I missing?

Comment 9 Elad 2017-05-07 08:14:38 UTC
Used:
rhevm-4.1.2-0.1.el7.noarch

Comment 10 Allon Mureinik 2017-05-08 09:39:42 UTC
(In reply to Elad from comment #8)
> Set block domain to maintenance and inserted a line to 'luns' table:
> 
> engine=# insert INTO luns values
> ('lun','lun','lun','lun','3','lun','lun','10','233','t');
> INSERT 0 1
> 
>            physical_volume_id           |      lun_id       
> ----------------------------------------+-------------------
>  XJRsDH-13bf-29bB-6c9G-6vMP-j3pL-CXr3XI | 3514f0c5a516004ac
>  2Vlo30-ciJY-d6xf-zEVz-YYY8-sbKl-IVJWEB | 3514f0c5a516004ab
>  DSbwKT-rGJu-aOma-G8lf-vg9q-Yk52-ds4TZf | 3514f0c5a516004aa
>  4fpBIy-Hpxg-P0Ej-t9db-ZZt7-N4Ge-vloyaS | 3514f0c5a51600215
>  L7XnOI-A5r1-B8uq-gaOH-Sgbd-ySoB-mWDbdG | 3514f0c5a51600213
>  LJmZ5x-0avg-rS32-fyOw-1SdW-nLHY-m0fkQh | 3514f0c5a516004ad
>  lun                                    | lun
>  T3SH1U-sgQq-ItqR-wl4h-1ZpY-NJiC-VQEm0X | 3514f0c5a51600214
> (8 rows)
> 
> 
> 
> Then, activated the domain. The LUN wasn't removed from 'luns' table.
> 
> Allon, what am I missing?
This LUN is unrelated to the domain you're activating, so it won't be affected.
You need to set the volume_group_id column to match the domain's.

Comment 11 Elad 2017-05-08 11:23:34 UTC
Thanks Allon.


Inserted the following row to 'luns' table while iscsi domain with VG UUID is  vj7PzK-pAUn-u6tC-mgLG-0mKV-G9f9-8tGsQy was in maintenance (iscsi_0). 

      storage_name      | status 
------------------------+--------
 rhevm-qe-infra-glance  |       
 ovirt-image-repository |       
 iscsi_1                |      3
 fcp_1                  |      3
 test_gluster_1         |      3
 nfs_1                  |      3
 fcp_2                  |      3
 fcp_0                  |      3
 nfs_0                  |      3
 nfs_2                  |      3
 export_domain          |      3
 test_gluster_2         |      3
 test_gluster_0         |      3
 iscsi_2                |      3
 iscsi_0                |      6
(15 rows)



engine=# insert INTO luns values ('pv_id','lun_id','vj7PzK-pAUn-u6tC-mgLG-0mKV-G9f9-8tGsQy','serial','3','vendor','product','11','233','t');


Then, activated the domain. The row didn't get removed upon domain activation. 

Logs will be provided.

Comment 12 Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine 2017-05-08 11:23:40 UTC
Target release should be placed once a package build is known to fix a issue. Since this bug is not modified, the target version has been reset. Please use target milestone to plan a fix for a oVirt release.

Comment 13 Elad 2017-05-08 11:40:03 UTC
Created attachment 1277090 [details]
engine.log

Comment 14 Allon Mureinik 2017-05-14 05:56:43 UTC
The urgent part for 4.1.2 is that the activate should succeed, which it does.

The remaining LUN that Elad reported in comment 11 is obviously still a bug though.
Idan - can you look into this please?

Comment 15 Idan Shaby 2017-05-16 08:01:29 UTC
Yes, sure.
I will soon push a fix for it.

Comment 16 Elad 2017-06-05 10:44:31 UTC
Inserted the following row to 'luns' table while iscsi domain with VG UUID is   8murUB-rAYZ-y63c-Oljm-bjy3-3Lwe-o7cDJ5 was in maintenance (iscsi_0). 

After domain activation, the inserted row got removed from luns table.

Tested using:
rhevm-4.1.3.1-0.1.el7.noarch
postgresql-9.2.18-1.el7.x86_64
vdsm-4.19.17-1.el7ev.x86_64

Comment 17 Elad 2017-06-05 10:46:22 UTC
* The row instereted to luns table:

insert INTO luns values ('pv_id','lun_id','8murUB-rAYZ-y63c-Oljm-bjy3-3Lwe-o7cDJ5','serial','3','vendor','product','11','233','t');


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.