Bug 1439895
| Summary: | NetApp Cinder back end does not deploy in OSP-11 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Alan Bishop <abishop> |
| Component: | openstack-tripleo-heat-templates | Assignee: | Alan Bishop <abishop> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Tzach Shefi <tshefi> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 11.0 (Ocata) | CC: | acanan, cschwede, eharney, emacchi, jschluet, lbopf, mburns, morazi, pgrist, rhel-osp-director-maint, scohen, tshefi |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | OtherQA |
| Target Release: | 11.0 (Ocata) | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-6.0.0-7.el7ost | Doc Type: | No Doc Update |
| Doc Text: |
undefined
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-05-17 20:18:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Alan Bishop
2017-04-06 19:19:10 UTC
Good catch here. I don't think we have anything solid in place to catch this for partners that have added OOO deployment for at least Cinder. Is there any way to check if there are other similar issues to catch now in the OSP11/ocata? This bugzilla has been removed from the release and needs to be reviewed and Triaged for another Target Release. Paul, no we currently don't have upstream CI jobs that test netapp and other vendors integration in TripleO. I think I can help out with this. Merged on master, proposed backport: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/456264/ Backport to stable/ocata is stuck due to upstream bug that is blocking CI (https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1682001) When it lands lands in stable/ocata, will it need to be explicitly backported to OSP-11 or will/can it be picked up by the next rebase? Upstream patch just merged. Moving to POST. Note to QE:
Please be sure to focus on the OSP-10 to OSP-11 upgrade path. See my note to
the Doc team for details.
Note to Doc team:
Section 3.4.2 of the upgrade document [1] covers situations where the customer
is deploying modified overcloud templates, and section 3 of the NetApp Block
Storage Back End Guide [2] directs the operator to do just that.
In order to successfully upgrade OSP-10 to OSP-11 with a NetApp back end, the
customer will need to sync their modified version of
environments/cinder-netapp-config.yaml with the new version in OSP-11.
Specifically, they need to _replace_ this line (applicable in OSP-10):
OS::TripleO::ControllerExtraConfigPre: ../puppet/extraconfig/pre_deploy/controller/cinder-netapp.yaml
With this (applicable in OSP-11):
OS::TripleO::Services::CinderBackendNetApp: ../puppet/services/cinder-backend-netapp.yaml
The guide [2] explains the path to the .yaml file needs to be updated from a
relative path ("../puppet") to an absolute path. This applies to the new
cinder-backend-netapp.yaml file in OSP-11.
[1] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/10/html/upgrading_red_hat_openstack_platform/
[2] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/10/html/netapp_block_storage_back_end_guide/index
The doc notes I outline in comment #9 are being incorporated into the overall upgrade documentation. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017:1245 |