Description of problem: When installing gnome-panel-2.8.1-3 or running "LANG=C LC_ALL=C gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule /etc/gconf/schemas/panel-default-setup-battstat.entries" it gives: Resolved address "xml::/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults" to a writable configuration source at position 0 Document `/etc/gconf/schemas/panel-default-setup-battstat.entries' has the wrong type of root node (<gconfentryfile>, should be <gconfschemafile>) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gnome-panel-2.8.1-3 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Actual results: see above Expected results: No error message, gconf schema installed Additional info:
Hmm, I'd expect that error message with --makefile-install-rule, but I don't understand how you're getting when installing the package because the package installs that file with --load rather than --makefile-install-rule. Are you sure you get: " Document `/etc/gconf/schemas/panel-default-setup-battstat.entries' has the wrong type of root node (<gconfentryfile>, should be <gconfschemafile>) " when installing the package?
Bah, my initial description was wrong with respect to the installation part -- I had a severe problem on my root partition that confused many configuration files and after the usual salvaging I decided to do the gconftool thing above on all files in the directory. That's where I got the error from (I just kind of assumed that the error would show when installing the package as well). Still this at least makes me suspect there's something wrong with the file, isn't it? BTW: the %post section only checks for APM, doesn't the battstat_applet work with ACPI as well?
So, how did you wind up running gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule panel-default-setup-battstat.entries ? i.e. did you just assume that's what you're supposed to do for all files in /etc/gconf/schemas or was it contained in something generated from the %post scriptlet? If the former, then its NOTABUG - .entries files are loaded with --load and .schemas files are loaded with --makefile-install-rule. If the latter, then something odd is going on somewhere. As for the ACPI question, see bug #143828
The former (doh), sorry.