Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RDO tickets are now tracked in Jira https://issues.redhat.com/projects/RDO/issues/

Bug 1440120

Summary: New package: shade
Product: [Community] RDO Reporter: Tristan Cacqueray <tdecacqu>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: hguemar
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: hguemar
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: trunk   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: trunk   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-04-07 12:52:50 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Tristan Cacqueray 2017-04-07 10:42:39 UTC 
Description of problem:

shade is a simple client library for interacting with OpenStack clouds. The
key word here is *simple*. Clouds can do many many many things - but there are
probably only about 10 of them that most people care about with any
regularity. If you want to do complicated things, you should probably use
the lower level client libraries - or even the REST API directly. However,
if what you want is to be able to write an application that talks to clouds
no matter what crazy choices the deployer has made in an attempt to be
more hipster than their self-entitled narcissist peers, then shade is for you.


Additional info:

http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/shade

There is an initial spec available at https://fedorapeople.org/~tdecacqu/shade.spec
Comment 1 Alan Pevec 2017-04-07 12:52:50 UTC 
python-shade is already in Fedora:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-shade/

Fedora Review was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271768
so we don't need to repeat it in RDO.
NB Fedora package is python-shade not shade as you proposed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1271768 ***