Bug 1441213 - system.schedulePackageRemove and schedulePackageRemoveByNevra wrong description
Summary: system.schedulePackageRemove and schedulePackageRemoveByNevra wrong description
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: API
Version: 580
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomáš Kašpárek
QA Contact: Lukáš Hellebrandt
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: sat580-low
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-04-11 12:41 UTC by Lukáš Hellebrandt
Modified: 2017-06-21 12:17 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: spacewalk-java-2.5.14-74-sat
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-06-21 12:17:46 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lukáš Hellebrandt 2017-04-11 12:41:52 UTC 
Description of problem:
In Help->API, the system.schedulePackageRemove API call has wrong description in one of its two overloaded versions and system.schedulePackageRemoveByNevra API call has wrong description in both versions.

Actual results:
"Schedule package installation for several systems.", "Schedule package installation for a system. "

Expected results:
"Schedule package removal for several systems.", "Schedule package removal for a system. "

Additional info:
Will provide patch
Comment 1 Tomáš Kašpárek 2017-04-20 11:59:33 UTC 
spacewalk.git(master): 018e9bd16bbc9c0d55f68a44aac30bc87ed2dbf4
Comment 4 Lukáš Hellebrandt 2017-04-24 12:36:18 UTC 
FailedQA. Description of schedulePackageRemove(string,int,[int],dateTime) has not been fixed. Will provide patch.
Comment 5 Lukáš Hellebrandt 2017-04-25 09:08:26 UTC 
PR: https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pull/536
Comment 6 Tomáš Kašpárek 2017-04-25 09:32:14 UTC 
spacewalk.git(master): 8fad475c96af8c1e9daa87dd0ae7a6d7682ec586
Comment 9 Lukáš Hellebrandt 2017-05-04 14:10:20 UTC 
Verified with spacewalk-java-2.5.14-76.

The API calls' descriptions are now correct.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.