Bug 1442284 - FreeIPA cannot be installed on Rawhide due to custodia conflict with freeipa < 4.5
Summary: FreeIPA cannot be installed on Rawhide due to custodia conflict with freeipa ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: custodia
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Simo Sorce
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: AlphaBlocker, F27AlphaBlocker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-04-13 23:40 UTC by Adam Williamson
Modified: 2017-05-26 21:29 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-26 21:29:12 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Adam Williamson 2017-04-13 23:40:26 UTC
It is impossible to install FreeIPA server on Rawhide at present, because custodia conflicts with freeipa-server-common < 4.5:

<mock-chroot> sh-4.4# dnf install freeipa-server --best
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Thu Apr 13 16:35:33 2017 PDT.
Error: package freeipa-server-common-4.4.4-1.fc27.noarch requires custodia, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package custodia-0.3.1-2.fc27.noarch conflicts with freeipa-server-common < 4.5 provided by freeipa-server-common-4.4.4-1.fc27.noarch

I see no sign of a freeipa 4.5 build even being attempted in Rawhide. The updated custodia should not have been sent to Rawhide without a compatible FreeIPA, and if one isn't forthcoming soon, it should be reverted.

Proposing as a Fedora 27 Alpha blocker: "Release-blocking roles and the supported role configuration interfaces must meet the core functional Role Definition Requirements to the extent that supported roles can be successfully deployed, started, stopped, brought to a working configuration, and queried" - domain controller is a release-blocking role.

Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2017-05-22 21:42:16 UTC
ping?

Comment 2 Tomasz Torcz 2017-05-26 21:06:31 UTC
There's FreeIPA 4.5.1 in Rawhide, now (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=897630). Does it fix the issue?

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2017-05-26 21:24:59 UTC
Yep. It does here at least...

Comment 4 Adam Williamson 2017-05-26 21:29:12 UTC
We don't seem to have a Rawhide compose since 20170522, now I look - been so busy with F26 stuff I hadn't noticed before. So, the openQA tests haven't checked this. But, let me see quickly with a mock chroot...

<time passes>

yeah, it does seem to be installable. No idea if it works till we get a compose, though. Thanks!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.