Bug 1442361
| Summary: | Guest network can't resume after link down/up the backend device | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Zhengtong <zhengtli> |
| Component: | NetworkManager | Assignee: | Beniamino Galvani <bgalvani> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 7.4 | CC: | atragler, bgalvani, fgiudici, lrintel, rkhan, sukulkar, thaller, vbenes, yilzhang, yiwei |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-04-10 13:22:08 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1470965 | ||
| Attachments: | |||
|
Description
Zhengtong
2017-04-14 10:08:50 UTC
Only happens on ppc64le platform Hi, can you please: 1. run 'nmcli general logging level trace' 2. attach the output of 'ip a' before setting tap0 down 3. set tap0 down and up again 4. verify that the bug is reproduced, i.e. you can't ping the VM 5. attach again the output of 'ip a' 6. also attach the output of 'journalctl -u NetworkManager -b' ? Thanks! (In reply to Beniamino Galvani from comment #3) > Hi, > > can you please: > > 1. run 'nmcli general logging level trace' > 2. attach the output of 'ip a' before setting tap0 down > 3. set tap0 down and up again > 4. verify that the bug is reproduced, i.e. you can't ping the VM > 5. attach again the output of 'ip a' > 6. also attach the output of 'journalctl -u NetworkManager -b' > > ? Will update the info after testing ASAIC Hi Beniamino, My original testing machine has been returned to beaker, So the environment was lost. I tried again with the latest qemu-kvm-rhev package(qemu-kvm-rhev-2.9.0-1) and NetworkManager-1.8.0-0.4.rc1.el7.ppc64le, failed to reproduce the problem.I tried switching NeworkManager package, still failed to reproduce. So I think you can close this bug now. I will keep the environment if I hit the issue again, thanks. Created attachment 1289031 [details]
Log of running "journalctl -u NetworkManager -b"
This bug is hit again on the following version of conponents: qemu-kvm-rhev-2.9.0-10.el7.ppc64le NetworkManager-1.8.0-9.el7.ppc64le (In reply to Beniamino Galvani from comment #3) > Hi, > > can you please: > > 1. run 'nmcli general logging level trace' > 2. attach the output of 'ip a' before setting tap0 down [root@ibm-p8-08 yilzhang]# ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: enP5p1s0f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be945cfdb4 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:5c:fd:b4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 3: enP5p1s0f1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be945cfdb5 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:5c:fd:b5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 4: enP5p1s0f2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be945cfdb6 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:5c:fd:b6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 5: enP5p1s0f3: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be945cfdb7 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:5c:fd:b7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 6: enP6p1s0f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be9459ee34 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:ee:34 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: enP6p1s0f1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be9459ee35 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:ee:35 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 8: enP6p1s0f2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be9459ee36 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:ee:36 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 9: enP6p1s0f3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master switch portid 98be9459ee37 state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:ee:37 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 11: switch: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:ee:37 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.16.42.52/21 brd 10.16.47.255 scope global dynamic switch valid_lft 79834sec preferred_lft 79834sec inet6 2620:52:0:102f:8f5:e2ff:fec3:8dd5/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft 2591235sec preferred_lft 604035sec inet6 2620:52:0:102f:887f:c9ff:fe4f:88c8/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft 2588808sec preferred_lft 601608sec inet6 2620:52:0:102f:9abe:94ff:fe59:ee37/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft 2591931sec preferred_lft 604731sec inet6 fe80::d893:1eff:febb:c29/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 20: tap0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master switch state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether fa:49:c6:71:98:7c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::f849:c6ff:fe71:987c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 3. set tap0 down and up again > 4. verify that the bug is reproduced, i.e. you can't ping the VM > 5. attach again the output of 'ip a' [root@ibm-p8-08 yilzhang]# ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: enP5p1s0f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be945cfdb4 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:5c:fd:b4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 3: enP5p1s0f1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be945cfdb5 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:5c:fd:b5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 4: enP5p1s0f2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be945cfdb6 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:5c:fd:b6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 5: enP5p1s0f3: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be945cfdb7 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:5c:fd:b7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 6: enP6p1s0f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be9459ee34 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:ee:34 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: enP6p1s0f1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be9459ee35 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:ee:35 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 8: enP6p1s0f2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq portid 98be9459ee36 state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:ee:36 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 9: enP6p1s0f3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master switch portid 98be9459ee37 state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:ee:37 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 11: switch: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:ee:37 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.16.42.52/21 brd 10.16.47.255 scope global dynamic switch valid_lft 79638sec preferred_lft 79638sec inet6 2620:52:0:102f:8f5:e2ff:fec3:8dd5/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft 2591040sec preferred_lft 603840sec inet6 2620:52:0:102f:887f:c9ff:fe4f:88c8/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft 2588612sec preferred_lft 601412sec inet6 2620:52:0:102f:9abe:94ff:fe59:ee37/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft 2591826sec preferred_lft 604626sec inet6 fe80::d893:1eff:febb:c29/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 20: tap0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether fa:49:c6:71:98:7c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::f849:c6ff:fe71:987c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 6. also attach the output of 'journalctl -u NetworkManager -b' The output is in the attachment (see Comment 6) > > ? Thanks! Hi, thanks for providing logs. the following script: nmcli connection add type bridge ifname br1 con-name br1+ ipv4.method disabled ipv6.method ignore autoconnect no nmcli connection up br1+ ip tuntap add mode tap tap0 ip l set tap0 up ip l set tap0 master br1 sleep 1 ip l set tap0 down sleep 1 ip l show tap0 # tap0 should be still enslaved to br1 should reproduce the issue you are seeing. The script fails on RHEL 7.4 (NM 1.8) as the tap interface is wrongly released from the bridge. The attached patch fixes this. On RHEL 7.3 (NM 1.4) the issue doesn't seem to be reproducible. Would you mind attaching a log for this version, captured as per comment 3? Created attachment 1294666 [details]
[PATCH] device: don't release external slaves on state change
(In reply to Beniamino Galvani from comment #3) > Hi, > > can you please: > > 1. run 'nmcli general logging level trace' [root@ibm-p8-09 home]# nmcli general logging level trace [root@ibm-p8-09 home]# > 2. attach the output of 'ip a' before setting tap0 down 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: enP5p1s0f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f0:64 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 3: enP5p1s0f1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f0:65 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 4: enP5p1s0f2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f0:66 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 5: enP5p1s0f3: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f0:67 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 6: enP6p1s0f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f1:bc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: enP6p1s0f1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f1:bd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 8: enP6p1s0f2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f1:be brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 9: enP6p1s0f3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master switch state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f1:bf brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 10: switch: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 22:91:58:5f:59:02 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.16.42.53/21 brd 10.16.47.255 scope global dynamic switch valid_lft 85334sec preferred_lft 85334sec inet6 2620:52:0:102f:2091:58ff:fe5f:5902/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft 2591961sec preferred_lft 604761sec inet6 2620:52:0:102f:9abe:94ff:fe59:f1bf/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft 2591907sec preferred_lft 604707sec inet6 fe80::1c7a:59ff:fed0:2c30/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 12: tap0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master switch state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 22:91:58:5f:59:02 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::2091:58ff:fe5f:5902/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 3. set tap0 down and up again [root@ibm-p8-09 ~]# ifconfig tap0 down [root@ibm-p8-09 ~]# ifconfig tap0 up [root@ibm-p8-09 ~]# > 4. verify that the bug is reproduced, i.e. you can't ping the VM guest network recovered on HREL7.3 > 5. attach again the output of 'ip a' [root@ibm-p8-09 ~]# ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: enP5p1s0f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f0:64 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 3: enP5p1s0f1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f0:65 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 4: enP5p1s0f2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f0:66 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 5: enP5p1s0f3: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f0:67 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 6: enP6p1s0f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f1:bc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: enP6p1s0f1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f1:bd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 8: enP6p1s0f2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f1:be brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 9: enP6p1s0f3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master switch state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 98:be:94:59:f1:bf brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 10: switch: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 22:91:58:5f:59:02 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.16.42.53/21 brd 10.16.47.255 scope global dynamic switch valid_lft 85174sec preferred_lft 85174sec inet6 2620:52:0:102f:2091:58ff:fe5f:5902/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft 2591920sec preferred_lft 604720sec inet6 2620:52:0:102f:9abe:94ff:fe59:f1bf/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft 2591747sec preferred_lft 604547sec inet6 fe80::1c7a:59ff:fed0:2c30/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 12: tap0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master switch state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 22:91:58:5f:59:02 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::2091:58ff:fe5f:5902/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 6. also attach the output of 'journalctl -u NetworkManager -b' Attached > > ? Thanks! Created attachment 1294821 [details]
RHEL7.3_networkmanager log
x86_64 hit the same issue. version: 3.10.0-691.rt56.615.el7.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-2.9.0-14.el7.x86_64 NetworkManager-1.8.0-8.el7.x86_64 (In reply to Zhengtong from comment #10) > > 4. verify that the bug is reproduced, i.e. you can't ping the VM > guest network recovered on HREL7.3 > > 5. attach again the output of 'ip a' > 12: tap0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master switch ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Thanks, this confirms my observation that the problem does not happen on RHEL 7.3. (In reply to Beniamino Galvani from comment #9) > Created attachment 1294666 [details] > [PATCH] device: don't release external slaves on state change + gboolean configure = FALSE; ^^ TRUE anyway, I removed many places where we look at the state reason. It is very ugly to do so, because it's hard to follow how the reason is passed on. The decision what to do should be done based on the device's state, most notably the "state" and "sys-iface-state". Why is the "release" variable not FALSE, if master shouldn't un-enslave? (In reply to Thomas Haller from comment #14) > (In reply to Beniamino Galvani from comment #9) > > Created attachment 1294666 [details] > > [PATCH] device: don't release external slaves on state change > > + gboolean configure = FALSE; > ^^ TRUE Oops, fixed. > anyway, I removed many places where we look at the state reason. It is very > ugly to do so, because it's hard to follow how the reason is passed on. > > The decision what to do should be done based on the device's state, most > notably the "state" and "sys-iface-state". We need to detach the slave only for assumed connections; neither the state nor the sys-iface-state are useful to determine the assumed condition. For sys-iface-state, one could think that EXTERNAL means an assumed connection, however we currently change the sys-iface-state to MANAGED after the assumed connection becomes active. This should be probably changed, but I think the change has a larger scope and shouldn't be done as part of this bz. > Why is the "release" variable not FALSE, if master shouldn't un-enslave? "release" means that the slave must be removed from the master's list of slaves. "configure" tells whether this must also be done at the platform level. Created attachment 1300926 [details]
[PATCH v2] device: don't release external slaves on state change
(In reply to Beniamino Galvani from comment #15) > (In reply to Thomas Haller from comment #14) > > (In reply to Beniamino Galvani from comment #9) > > > > anyway, I removed many places where we look at the state reason. It is very > > ugly to do so, because it's hard to follow how the reason is passed on. > > > > The decision what to do should be done based on the device's state, most > > notably the "state" and "sys-iface-state". > > We need to detach the slave only for assumed connections; neither the > state nor the sys-iface-state are useful to determine the assumed > condition. > > For sys-iface-state, one could think that EXTERNAL means an assumed > connection, however we currently change the sys-iface-state to MANAGED > after the assumed connection becomes active. This should be probably > changed, but I think the change has a larger scope and shouldn't be done > as part of this bz. I disagree. The coined new terms for 1.8. "assume" now means "gracefully take over". If you mean "should not touch", it's called "external". sys-iface-state should correspond to that. Yes, activating an assumed connection will indeed switch to managed after activation completes. That's the point: after the interface is gracefully taken over, it's managed like a regular activation. When activating an "external" connection, sys-iface-state stays as "external". If "sys-iface-state" is wrong/not-useful, the state should be fixed. (In reply to Thomas Haller from comment #17) > > If "sys-iface-state" is wrong/not-useful, the state should be fixed. How about branch bg/external-slaves-rh1442361 ? if ( NM_IN_SET_TYPED (NMDeviceSysIfaceState,
priv->sys_iface_state,
- NM_DEVICE_SYS_IFACE_STATE_EXTERNAL,
NM_DEVICE_SYS_IFACE_STATE_ASSUME)
&& nm_device_sys_iface_state_get (priv->master) == NM_DEVICE_SYS_IFACE_STATE_MANAGED)
nm_device_sys_iface_state_set (self, NM_DEVICE_SYS_IFACE_STATE_MANAGED);
Now we only set the state MANAGED, if the state is ASSUMED previously. I wonder, if that is necessary, because the idea is, once activation completes, to anyway promote ASSUMED to MANAGED. The state is only ASSUMED, if it's still activating. In this case, I think the state should stay. Can you add a follow-up patch, to drop this "if" entirely? (or what's your opinion?)
Otherwise, the 2 patches look right to me!! I am not sure this is 100% correct, but it seems the right approach to me.
(In reply to Thomas Haller from comment #19) > Now we only set the state MANAGED, if the state is ASSUMED previously. I > wonder, if that is necessary, because the idea is, once activation > completes, to anyway promote ASSUMED to MANAGED. The state is only ASSUMED, > if it's still activating. In this case, I think the state should stay. Can > you add a follow-up patch, to drop this "if" entirely? (or what's your > opinion?) I dropped the 'if' entirely and merged to master: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?id=6a740fa247fefc8cc5c0b50458108e654db91dc5 nm-1-8: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?h=nm-1-8&id=6bc73f15906502cebdadeda70466640f792982ae CI test: https://github.com/NetworkManager/NetworkManager-ci/pull/20 Hi Zhengtong, I hit same issue on x86_64 platform.Should you change the hardware status to all ? (In reply to Yiqian Wei from comment #21) > Hi Zhengtong, > > I hit same issue on x86_64 platform.Should you change the hardware status > to all ? While I hit this issue. I tried on x86_64, It passed then. If you hit it on x86_64 now, I think that may be a regression of x86_64. I am not sure if this could be the same issue. Leave the decision to bgalvani. (In reply to Yiqian Wei from comment #21) > Hi Zhengtong, > > I hit same issue on x86_64 platform.Should you change the hardware status > to all ? Yes, the bug is present on all architectures. Automated here: https://github.com/NetworkManager/NetworkManager-ci/blob/master/nmcli/features/general.feature#L1564 Executed on daily basis in CI on devel branches and working well on 7.5's candidate too. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0778 |