Bug 1442853 - Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
Summary: Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: PantheonDesktopPackageReviews
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-04-17 18:44 UTC by Fabio Valentini
Modified: 2017-11-11 17:12 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-04-27 05:51:25 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fabio Valentini 2017-04-17 18:44:46 UTC
Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgsignon-glib.spec

SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgsignon-glib-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc26.src.rpm

Description: This project is a library for managing single signon credentials which can be used from GLib applications. It is effectively a GLib binding for the D-Bus API provided by gsignond.

Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe


koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19048060


PS: The additional support for python is not enabled on purpose, since it only supports python2.

Comment 1 Neal Gompa 2017-04-17 19:40:53 UTC
Taking this review.

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2017-04-17 19:46:02 UTC
A few issues:

> Requires:       dbus%{?isa}
> Requires:       gsignond%{?isa}

The macro should be "%{?_isa}".

> %package        devel
> Summary:        GSignOn daemon development files

The summary is wrong for this library.

> %files devel
> %{_bindir}/gsso-example

Move this into its own subpackage, as it doesn't depend on the devel content at all, and isn't needed for devel stuff.

Comment 3 Fabio Valentini 2017-04-17 21:07:49 UTC
Issues are fixed, same links.

Comment 4 Neal Gompa 2017-04-17 21:22:22 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "*No copyright* LGPL (v2.1)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "LGPL
     (v2.1)", "Unknown or generated". 52 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/makerpm/1442853-libgsignon-
     glib/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/girepository-1.0,
     /usr/share/vala/vapi, /usr/share/gir-1.0, /usr/share/vala
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     libgsignon-glib-debuginfo
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: libgsignon-glib-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc27.x86_64.rpm
          libgsignon-glib-devel-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc27.x86_64.rpm
          libgsignon-glib-example-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc27.x86_64.rpm
          libgsignon-glib-debuginfo-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc27.x86_64.rpm
          libgsignon-glib-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc27.src.rpm
0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: libgsignon-glib-debuginfo-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc27.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
libgsignon-glib-example.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US signon -> chignon, signor, sign on
libgsignon-glib-example.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gsignond -> monsignor
libgsignon-glib-example.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
libgsignon-glib-example.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libgsignon-glib-example.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
libgsignon-glib-example.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
libgsignon-glib-example.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gsso-example
libgsignon-glib-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US signon -> chignon, signor, sign on
libgsignon-glib-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gsignond -> monsignor
libgsignon-glib-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
libgsignon-glib-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libgsignon-glib.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US signon -> chignon, signor, sign on
libgsignon-glib.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gsignond -> monsignor
libgsignon-glib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsignon-glib.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0
libgsignon-glib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgsignon-glib.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0
libgsignon-glib.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libgsignon-glib.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
libgsignon-glib.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 18 warnings.



Requires
--------
libgsignon-glib-example (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgsignon-glib(x86-64)
    libgsignon-glib.so.1()(64bit)
    libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libgsignon-glib-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    libgsignon-glib(x86-64)
    libgsignon-glib.so.1()(64bit)
    pkgconfig(gio-unix-2.0)
    pkgconfig(glib-2.0)
    pkgconfig(gobject-2.0)

libgsignon-glib (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    dbus(x86-64)
    gsignond(x86-64)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libgsignon-glib-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
libgsignon-glib-example:
    libgsignon-glib-example
    libgsignon-glib-example(x86-64)

libgsignon-glib-devel:
    libgsignon-glib-devel
    libgsignon-glib-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(libgsignon-glib)

libgsignon-glib:
    libgsignon-glib
    libgsignon-glib(x86-64)
    libgsignon-glib.so.1()(64bit)

libgsignon-glib-debuginfo:
    libgsignon-glib-debuginfo
    libgsignon-glib-debuginfo(x86-64)



Source checksums
----------------
https://gitlab.com/accounts-sso/libgsignon-glib/repository/archive.tar.gz?ref=03d9c64c0cd1b9a5c399e531f6d83d2f2998094c#/libgsignon-glib-03d9c64.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 71f155008a14f3daf89b747d8893f3584a3c4a5929666ef5904ddc5dc42f23b9
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 71f155008a14f3daf89b747d8893f3584a3c4a5929666ef5904ddc5dc42f23b9


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/bin/fedora-review -b 1442853 -m ../../home/makerpm/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-koji
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64-koji
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 5 Neal Gompa 2017-04-17 21:22:43 UTC
Looks good to me.

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2017-04-17 22:20:22 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libgsignon-glib

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2017-04-17 22:44:47 UTC
libgsignon-glib-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7da348eda5

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2017-04-17 22:53:37 UTC
libgsignon-glib-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-28e7fc0b45

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2017-04-18 13:22:52 UTC
libgsignon-glib-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-28e7fc0b45

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2017-04-18 19:53:48 UTC
libgsignon-glib-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7da348eda5

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2017-04-27 05:51:25 UTC
libgsignon-glib-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.