Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1442943 - dht/rebalance: Increase maximum read block size from 128 KB to 1 MB
dht/rebalance: Increase maximum read block size from 128 KB to 1 MB
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: distribute (Show other bugs)
3.3
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ---
: RHGS 3.3.0
Assigned To: Susant Kumar Palai
Karan Sandha
: Triaged
Depends On: 1428055
Blocks: 1417151
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2017-04-18 03:06 EDT by Susant Kumar Palai
Modified: 2017-09-21 00:37 EDT (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.8.4-23
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
The maximum block size for rebalance operations (DHT_REBALANCE_BLKSIZE) has been increased to 1MB from the previous value of 128KB in order to improve rebalance operation time for large files.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1428055
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-09-21 00:37:54 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:2774 normal SHIPPED_LIVE glusterfs bug fix and enhancement update 2017-09-21 04:16:29 EDT

  None (edit)
Comment 2 Atin Mukherjee 2017-04-18 03:11:29 EDT
Upstream patch : https://review.gluster.org/16797
Comment 7 Atin Mukherjee 2017-04-20 09:26:41 EDT
downstream patch : https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/103900/
Comment 15 Susant Kumar Palai 2017-08-16 02:46:04 EDT
Doc looks fine to me.

Susant
Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2017-09-21 00:37:54 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2774

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.