Bug 1448434 - [GANESHA] posix compliance test failures
Summary: [GANESHA] posix compliance test failures
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: nfs-ganesha
Version: rhgs-3.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.3.0
Assignee: Jiffin
QA Contact: Manisha Saini
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1452083
Blocks: 1417151
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-05-05 12:16 UTC by Manisha Saini
Modified: 2017-09-21 04:41 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.8.4-31
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-09-21 04:41:45 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:2774 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE glusterfs bug fix and enhancement update 2017-09-21 08:16:29 UTC

Description Manisha Saini 2017-05-05 12:16:26 UTC
Description of problem:

chmod,ftruncate,mknod test failed with new posix complainace test suit. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glusterfs-ganesha-3.8.4-24.el7rhgs.x86_64

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.Create 4 node ganesha cluster.
2.Create 6*2 Distributed-Replicate volume.Enable ganesha on it
3.Mount the volume to client via V3/V4

Actual results:

====
V3
====

Test Summary Report
-------------------
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/chmod/00.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 106 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  31, 39
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/ftruncate/00.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 26 Failed: 1)
  Failed test:  24
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/link/00.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 82 Failed: 1)
  Failed test:  77
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/03.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 9)
  Failed tests:  1-3, 5-7, 9-11
Files=210, Tests=2328, 118 wallclock secs ( 1.07 usr  0.30 sys +  9.13 cusr 18.28 csys = 28.78 CPU)
Result: FAIL


====
V4
====

Test Summary Report
-------------------
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/chmod/00.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 106 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  31, 39
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/ftruncate/00.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 26 Failed: 1)
  Failed test:  24
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/link/00.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 82 Failed: 1)
  Failed test:  77
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/03.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 9)
  Failed tests:  1-3, 5-7, 9-11
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/open/07.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 23 Failed: 3)
  Failed tests:  5, 7, 9
Files=210, Tests=2328, 118 wallclock secs ( 1.15 usr  0.28 sys +  9.43 cusr 19.10 csys = 29.96 CPU)
Result: FAIL

Expected results:


Additional info:

link,open and secs test used to fail with previous posix compliance test suit with 3.2 also.

Comment 2 Manisha Saini 2017-05-05 12:17:54 UTC
Tets results with same posix compliance test suit with 3.2 build

glusterfs-ganesha-3.8.4-18.el7rhgs.x86_64

=====
V3
=====

Test Summary Report
-------------------
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/chmod/00.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 106 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  31, 39
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/ftruncate/00.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 26 Failed: 1)
  Failed test:  24
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/03.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 9)
  Failed tests:  1-3, 5-7, 9-11
Files=210, Tests=2328, 89 wallclock secs ( 1.04 usr  0.26 sys +  9.03 cusr 17.96 csys = 28.29 CPU)
Result: FAIL




====
V4
====

Test Summary Report
-------------------
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/chmod/00.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 106 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  31, 39
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/ftruncate/00.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 26 Failed: 1)
  Failed test:  24
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/03.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 9)
  Failed tests:  1-3, 5-7, 9-11
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/open/07.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 23 Failed: 3)
  Failed tests:  5, 7, 9
Files=210, Tests=2328, 89 wallclock secs ( 1.00 usr  0.27 sys +  8.81 cusr 17.60 csys = 27.68 CPU)
Result: FAIL

Comment 5 Jiffin 2017-05-17 12:21:02 UTC
Following are failures with new test suite
1.) chmod
2.) mknod
3.) ftruncate
4.) open
5.) link

Here both chomd and mknod are issues with gluster(reproducible with fuse client)

chmod -- is an expected behavior for glusterfs

mknod -- fail to special files with length 4096[PATH_MAX](applicable for directories and files as well). This is because at the backend we need to consider the brick path length as well. So the maximum path length for files inside a glster volume will be 4096-<brick path length>

ftruncate -- it is because of ganesha behavior
Test case : 
1.) create a directory with 0777 permission
2.)a specific user opens file with O_CREAT,O_RDWR and mode bit '0'
3.) then performs ftruncate using that fd

Actually with that opened fd, application can perform truncate. But incase of ganesha after creating(open2) file, it performs an access check in 
open2_by_name()[428 check_open_permission()] which fails with EACCESS since mode bits of that file is 000(----------)




open -- failures are similar to 3.2 only

link -- failing because of stale link to files in previous operation[after debugging does not look like regression from 3.2 can happen even in 3.2]

Testcase
1.) create a fifo file
2.) Trying to create hardlink fails with ESTALE instead of EACCESS

Can happens when hardlink and orginal file are in different subvols.

snippet from test case
-------------------------
expect 0 create ${n0} 0644
expect 0 -- chown ${n0} 65534 -1
|
|
expect EACCES -u 65534 link ${n0} ${n1}
|
|
|
expect 0 unlink ${n0}

expect 0 mkfifo ${n0} 0644
expect 0 -- chown ${n0} 65534 -1
|
|
|
expect EACCES -u 65534 link ${n0} ${n1}

The first hardlink call will fail with EACCESS, but 'T' (link to file) created by that call is not removed. So next hardlink call will with ESTALE because of that issue

Comment 7 Frank Filz 2017-05-23 23:24:46 UTC
So what is the cause and details of the chmod issue? Just want to understand.

For max name lengths, we may need to adjust max path len reported on exports, not sure how all that works. For the compliance tests, this may be a place having a ganesha-gluster type might help so it tries the max path length that can actually work.

I don't quite understand the link issue.

The ftruncate issue we have a fix for right? Or not?

Comment 10 Manisha Saini 2017-07-14 13:10:22 UTC
Verified this bug on

# rpm -qa | grep ganesha
nfs-ganesha-2.4.4-15.el7rhgs.x86_64
nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.4.4-15.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-ganesha-3.8.4-33.el7rhgs.x86_64



Known failures-



====
V3
====
Test Summary Report
-------------------
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/chmod/00.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 106 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  31, 39
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/03.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 9)
  Failed tests:  1-3, 5-7, 9-11
Files=210, Tests=2328, 91 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr  0.16 sys + 10.49 cusr 10.42 csys = 21.76 CPU)
Result: FAIL


======
V4
=====

Test Summary Report
-------------------
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/chmod/00.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 106 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  31, 39
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/03.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 9)
  Failed tests:  1-3, 5-7, 9-11
/home/new_posix/ntfs-3g-pjd-fstest/tests/open/07.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 23 Failed: 3)
  Failed tests:  5, 7, 9
Files=210, Tests=2328, 93 wallclock secs ( 0.68 usr  0.16 sys + 10.62 cusr 10.48 csys = 21.94 CPU)
Result: FAIL

Moving this bug to verified state.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2017-09-21 04:41:45 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2774


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.