RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1449382 - still have /bin/docker-storage-setup
Summary: still have /bin/docker-storage-setup
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: docker
Version: 7.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Daniel Walsh
QA Contact: atomic-bugs@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-05-09 20:38 UTC by Qian Cai
Modified: 2019-03-06 01:05 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1449384 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-09 20:45:25 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Qian Cai 2017-05-09 20:38:33 UTC 
Description of problem:
Since we are now shipping container-storage-setup rpm and the docker daemon is now calling c-s-s to setup storage, I don't see the real need to still have /bin/docker-storage-setup in the docker package. It seems like just going to confuse customers and generate support calls.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
docker-1.12.6-19.1.git92b10e4.el7.x86_64
container-storage-setup-0.3.0-1.git8276a1e.el7.noarch

How reproducible:
always
Comment 1 Daniel Walsh 2017-05-09 20:40:51 UTC 
docker-storage-setup should just be a link to container-storage-setup.

It is there for any tools like atomic that we useing the old name
Comment 2 Qian Cai 2017-05-09 20:45:25 UTC 
Yes, you are right. For some reasons, I first attempt to check if it was the symlink failed.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.