Bug 145052 - CAN-2005-0064 xpdf buffer overflow
Summary: CAN-2005-0064 xpdf buffer overflow
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: xpdf
Version: 4.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Than Ngo
QA Contact: Mike McLean
URL:
Whiteboard: impact=important,embargoed=20050118
Depends On:
Blocks: 142822
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-01-13 22:40 UTC by Josh Bressers
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-01-20 14:08:53 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2005:034 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: xpdf security update 2005-02-15 05:00:00 UTC

Description Josh Bressers 2005-01-13 22:40:43 UTC 
*** This bug has been split off bug 145049 ***

------- Original comment by Josh Bressers (Security Response Team) on 2005.01.13
17:30 -------

iDEFENSE has reported a stack based buffer overflow in xpdf.

The patch is here:
ftp://ftp.foolabs.com/pub/xpdf/xpdf-3.00pl3.patch


The iDEFENSE advisory is attachment 109745 [details]
Comment 1 Josh Bressers 2005-01-14 12:17:01 UTC 
The patch URL does not yet work.  We don't have a patch from upstream yet.  I'll
update the bugs as soon as I know.
Comment 2 Mark J. Cox 2005-01-19 10:25:38 UTC 
Now public, see URL for patch, removing embargo
Comment 3 Than Ngo 2005-01-20 12:14:55 UTC 
it's now fixed in xpdf-3.00-11.3
Comment 4 Than Ngo 2005-01-20 14:08:53 UTC 
it's now fixed in xpdf-3.00-11.3
Comment 5 Mark J. Cox 2005-02-15 09:27:10 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-034.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.