Bug 145218 - new package: Hylafax
Summary: new package: Hylafax
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: distribution
Version: 3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Marius Andreiana
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 145303
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-01-15 15:06 UTC by Marius Andreiana
Modified: 2013-01-10 03:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-05-05 18:16:22 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
spec patch for fedora compatibility (1.17 KB, patch)
2005-01-15 16:10 UTC, Michael Schwendt 		no flags Details | Diff
patch for malloc mistake (761 bytes, patch)
2005-01-15 16:10 UTC, Michael Schwendt 		no flags Details | Diff
View All

Description Marius Andreiana 2005-01-15 15:06:40 UTC 
Please add new package: Hylafax 4.2.1 
I'll try to do it, based on 4.2.0 source rpm from hylafax.org
Comment 1 Marius Andreiana 2005-01-15 15:14:53 UTC 
This requires metamail, which isn't in core/extras, and doesn't
compile in FC3 using srpm from
ftp://ftp.hylafax.org/binary/linux/redhat/SRPMS/metamail-2.7-29.src.rpm

shared.c:14: error: conflicting types for 'malloc'
Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2005-01-15 16:10:29 UTC 
Created attachment 109818 [details]
spec patch for fedora compatibility

metamail has had several security vulnerabilities, some of which were fixed by
Fedora Legacy. You better base your package on their src.rpm,

http://download.fedoralegacy.org/redhat/7.3/updates/SRPMS/metamail-2.7-29.7.x.legacy.src.rpm


and apply something like attached patch to fix the spec for Fedora. Else it
would fail to build.
Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2005-01-15 16:10:56 UTC 
Created attachment 109819 [details]
patch for malloc mistake
Comment 4 Marius Andreiana 2005-01-17 08:14:32 UTC 
THanks Michael, opened bug 145303 with metamail. After that is in fc3
extras I'll continue on hylafax
Comment 5 Christoph Wickert 2006-04-11 22:17:16 UTC 
Marius, are you still interested in this package? We have a new review request,
so I'm going to close this one duplicate of bug #188542 if I don't hear anything
from you.
Comment 6 Christoph Wickert 2006-05-05 18:16:22 UTC 
No reply, closing.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.