Bug 1453195 - Default firewall zone seems to be an insecure setting by default
Summary: Default firewall zone seems to be an insecure setting by default
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1172353
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: firewalld
Version: 25
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Thomas Woerner
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-05-22 11:22 UTC by Rolf Fokkens
Modified: 2017-05-22 12:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-22 12:05:16 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Rolf Fokkens 2017-05-22 11:22:50 UTC
Description of problem: Apparently firewalld is open to (m)any IP connections by default for new NetworkManager connections.

When connecting to a new WiFi network only a WiFi password (key) is requested, and next you are connected. The firewall zone for this NM connection is 'Default'.

This 'Default' Zone however is configured in firewall-config (another tool that needs te be installed manually) in Options as Fedora-Workstation. And this implies that MySQL, SSHD etc are all open.

This 'Default' seems very very wrong. When connecting a new WiFi network the 'Default' setting should be 'block'. If users intentionally want to open some network ports they shoud change this my hand afterwards.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
firewalld-0.4.4.4-1.fc25.noarch

How reproducible:
Install new Fedora 25, create a WiFi connection in an internet cafe, and enjoy the lack of insecurity that should surprise you

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install new Fedora 25
2. Create a WiFi connection
3. Start e.g. mysql/ssh or whatever
4. Allow new 'friends' to connect to mysql/ssh or whatever

Actual results:
Open network by default

Expected results:
Closed network by default

Additional info:

Comment 1 Thomas Woerner 2017-05-22 12:05:16 UTC
I am sorry, there is nothing I can do about this:

https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1372#comment-27998

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172353#c11

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1172353 ***

Comment 2 Rolf Fokkens 2017-05-22 12:52:09 UTC
This is deeply concerning. Every committee/wg points to another committee/wg, and since Fedora 21 nothing has been done?

Ah, why worry. It's only security.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.