+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1452006 +++ Description of problem: the tier daemon listen to a port. which is not necessary Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.10 and above How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1.create a volume. 2.attach a hot tier and make it a tiered volume. 3.gluster v status Actual results: gluster v status Status of volume: v1 Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hot Bricks: Brick 192.168.122.17:/data/gluster/bricks/h b2 49155 0 Y 3282 Brick 192.168.122.17:/data/gluster/bricks/h b1 49154 0 Y 3263 Cold Bricks: Brick 192.168.122.17:/data/gluster/bricks/b 1 49152 0 Y 3192 Brick 192.168.122.17:/data/gluster/bricks/b 2 49153 0 Y 3211 Tier Daemon on localhost 49156 0 Y 3306 Task Status of Volume v1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ There are no active volume tasks tier has a TCP port value. Expected results: gluster v status Status of volume: v1 Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hot Bricks: Brick 192.168.122.17:/data/gluster/bricks/h b2 49155 0 Y 26795 Brick 192.168.122.17:/data/gluster/bricks/h b1 49154 0 Y 26776 Cold Bricks: Brick 192.168.122.17:/data/gluster/bricks/b 1 49152 0 Y 26705 Brick 192.168.122.17:/data/gluster/bricks/b 2 49153 0 Y 26724 Tier Daemon on localhost N/A N/A Y 26941 Task Status of Volume v1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ There are no active volume tasks The TCP port and RDMA have to be N/A Additional info: --- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-05-18 04:48:41 EDT --- REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17328 (Tier: removing port allocated for tier) posted (#1) for review on master by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005) --- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-05-19 02:38:52 EDT --- REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17328 (Tier: removing port allocated for tier) posted (#2) for review on master by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005) --- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-05-29 07:06:51 EDT --- REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17328 (Tier: removing port allocated for tier) posted (#3) for review on master by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005) --- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-05-29 20:37:48 EDT --- COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/17328 committed in master by Shyamsundar Ranganathan (srangana) ------ commit 0a8b2db2d2c3993b25272a65fecad0d3d2866607 Author: hari gowtham <hgowtham> Date: Thu May 18 14:15:39 2017 +0530 Tier: removing port allocated for tier Problem: Tier has a port which it doesn't use. Fix: Remove the port getting allocated for tier. Change-Id: If0fe393fc335d9f622a063787e0a3c6db9b7a50c BUG: 1452006 Signed-off-by: hari gowtham <hgowtham> Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17328 Tested-by: hari gowtham <hari.gowtham005> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana>
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17420 (Tier: removing port allocated for tier) posted (#1) for review on release-3.10 by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/17420 committed in release-3.10 by Raghavendra Talur (rtalur) ------ commit 580ede76c7c9fbf2bb250d43996b26ab9ffa386e Author: hari gowtham <hgowtham> Date: Thu May 18 14:15:39 2017 +0530 Tier: removing port allocated for tier Problem: Tier has a port which it doesn't use. Fix: Remove the port getting allocated for tier. >Change-Id: If0fe393fc335d9f622a063787e0a3c6db9b7a50c >BUG: 1452006 >Signed-off-by: hari gowtham <hgowtham> >Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17328 >Tested-by: hari gowtham <hari.gowtham005> >NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> >CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> >Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> >Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana> Change-Id: If0fe393fc335d9f622a063787e0a3c6db9b7a50c BUG: 1456682 Signed-off-by: hari gowtham <hgowtham> Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17420 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Tested-by: hari gowtham <hari.gowtham005> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur>
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17427 (tier: port value missing on cli parsing) posted (#1) for review on release-3.10 by hari gowtham (hari.gowtham005)
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/17427 committed in release-3.10 by Raghavendra Talur (rtalur) ------ commit e51b1c9dd41dccc4c875f03e57c6186ea93abb0e Author: hari gowtham <hgowtham> Date: Tue May 30 15:50:25 2017 +0530 tier: port value missing on cli parsing problem: as tier didn't have a port all the values regarding the port were removed. but the cli needs a port value to parse and print the status. fix: fake the port value with a zero. >Change-Id: I6491f6c441f7cfddbdaa724fcbe7c30e348aa765 >BUG: 1452006 >Signed-off-by: hari gowtham <hgowtham> >Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17419 >Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> >Tested-by: hari gowtham <hari.gowtham005> >Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana> >Reviewed-by: Prashanth Pai <ppai> >CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> >Reviewed-by: Samikshan Bairagya <samikshan> >NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> >Reviewed-by: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj> Signed-off-by: hari gowtham <hgowtham> Change-Id: I6491f6c441f7cfddbdaa724fcbe7c30e348aa765 BUG: 1456682 Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17427 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Tested-by: hari gowtham <hari.gowtham005> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.10.3, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.10.3 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-June/031399.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/