Description of problem: Cannot start gnome control center [mzink@windmill ~] $ gnome-control-center gnome-control-center: error while loading shared libraries: libwbclient.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): control-center-filesystem-3.24.2-1.fc26.x86_64 control-center-3.24.2-1.fc26.x86_64 How reproducible: Try to start gnome-control-center without sssd-libwbclient package installed. Steps to Reproduce: $ gnome-control-center gnome-control-center: error while loading shared libraries: libwbclient.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Actual results: $ gnome-control-center gnome-control-center: error while loading shared libraries: libwbclient.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Expected results: gnome-control-center starting without problems. Package dependencies should be handled Additional info: $ sudo dnf provides */libwbclient.so.0 Last metadata expiration check: 1:16:12 ago on Tue May 30 08:23:29 2017 CEST. libwbclient-2:4.6.4-0.fc26.x86_64 : The winbind client library Repo : @System libwbclient-2:4.6.3-0.fc26.i686 : The winbind client library Repo : fedora libwbclient-2:4.6.3-0.fc26.x86_64 : The winbind client library Repo : fedora sssd-libwbclient-1.15.2-3.fc26.x86_64 : The SSSD libwbclient implementation Repo : fedora $ sudo dnf install libwbclient Last metadata expiration check: 1:17:04 ago on Tue May 30 08:23:29 2017 CEST. Package libwbclient-2:4.6.4-0.fc26.x86_64 is already installed, skipping. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! $ gnome-control-center gnome-control-center: error while loading shared libraries: libwbclient.so.0: $ sudo dnf install sssd-libwbclient Last metadata expiration check: 1:17:15 ago on Tue May 30 08:23:29 2017 CEST. Dependencies resolved. =============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Installing: sssd-libwbclient x86_64 1.15.2-3.fc26 fedora 72 k Transaction Summary =============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Install 1 Package Total download size: 72 k Installed size: 36 k Is this ok [y/N]: t Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: sssd-libwbclient-1.15.2-3.fc26.x86_64.rpm 1.5 MB/s | 72 kB 00:00 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 82 kB/s | 72 kB 00:00 Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Preparing : 1/1 Installing : sssd-libwbclient-1.15.2-3.fc26.x86_64 1/1 Running scriptlet: sssd-libwbclient-1.15.2-3.fc26.x86_64 1/1 Verifying : sssd-libwbclient-1.15.2-3.fc26.x86_64 1/1 Installed: sssd-libwbclient.x86_64 1.15.2-3.fc26 Complete! $ gnome-control-center - SUCCESS $ rpm -ql libwbclient /usr/lib64/samba/libwinbind-client-samba4.so /usr/lib64/samba/wbclient/libwbclient.so.0 /usr/lib64/samba/wbclient/libwbclient.so.0.13 $ rpm -ql sssd-libwbclient /usr/lib64/sssd /usr/lib64/sssd/modules /usr/lib64/sssd/modules/libwbclient.so.0 /usr/lib64/sssd/modules/libwbclient.so.0.13.0
Duplicate of #1360557 or #1456145 respectively.
gnome-control-center doesn't link directly to libwbclient.so so it sounds like a samba issue *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1456145 ***