Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1456928

Summary:	OSP8 doc misses procedure for /var/run to /var/lib migration for os-collect-config
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	Sofer Athlan-Guyot <sathlang>
Component:	documentation	Assignee:	Dan Macpherson <dmacpher>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.0 (Liberty)	CC:	dmacpher, srevivo
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Documentation, Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-05-30 17:10:47 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Sofer Athlan-Guyot 2017-05-30 16:59:53 UTC

Description of problem: It happens that OPS8 GA can be affected by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278181

So the same procedure should exist in OSP8 as https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/7/html-single/Director_Installation_and_Usage/index.html#sect-Updating_Overcloud_Packages sect "10.3.1. Configuration Agent".


This is valid if the tht templates used to deploy osp8 is < to openstack-heat-templates-0-0.8.20150605git.el7ost.noarch.rpm


For reference, this has been found in this bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451101

Comment 1 Sofer Athlan-Guyot 2017-05-30 17:03:56 UTC

Hi Dan,

So it looks like we need the same procedure in osp8.

Comment 2 Dan Macpherson 2017-05-30 17:10:47 UTC

Hi Sofer,

I've got a duplicate bug from jslagle, so I'll close this one. However, I've got a NEEDINFO there for James, but you might also know the answer. I'll add you as a NEEDINFO and if you can provide any help, please feel free to answer.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1455324 ***