RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
Two benchmarks / checklists shipped in rhel7 datastream of latest version scap-security-guide has the same title, user is not able to distinguish what is the difference between the two, and whether to use PCI-DSS profile from the main checklist, or the separate one.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
scap-security-guide-0.1.33-4.el7.noarch
(reproducer used scap-workbench-1.1.4-4.el7.x86_64)

How reproducible:
reliably

Steps to Reproduce:
1. open scap-workbench, select rhel7 content
2. try both checklists
3.

Actual results:
Title is the same, user has no indication what is the difference between those checlists

Expected results:
Title is different enough to give user clear information about difference.

Additional info:

Note: pci-dss_centric profile should be different view of the same, with grouping based directly on PCI-DSS specification, and SCAP rules supplied where appropriate. (instead of rule-centric pci-dss).

Distiction should be explained, though.

https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/pull/2214

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0761