Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1457827

Summary:	Changes to the voting system on glusterfs 'master' branch
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Amar Tumballi <atumball>
Component:	project-infrastructure	Assignee:	bugs <bugs>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	mainline	CC:	bugs, gluster-infra, nigelb
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-06-20 06:09:41 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Amar Tumballi 2017-06-01 11:51:14 UTC

Description of problem:

Only for 'master' branch:

- make the overall regression lightweight.
  - Run what netbsd tests run now for CentOS regression (ie, basic and features in tests) - will mostly take just <2hrs.
  - Don't run netbsd builds
  - Instead add a compilation test on centos 32bit machine to keep reminding ourself how many warnings we get. (And compilation failure there is -1).


On release-x.y branch:

- Continue with the currently existing voting rights, and the tests would be different. (ie, full regression instead of lightweight regression tests).


More info on this is found @ http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2017-May/002587.html

Comment 1 Nigel Babu 2017-06-05 04:25:16 UTC

On master:

1) I'm thinking we just run the tests/basic folder?
2) Do you mean netbsd builds or regressions? The netbsd build (netbsd6-smoke) itself takes a short duration and is trivial to run. I recommend we keep that remove the NetBSD voting job. Additionally, are we running the netbsd regressions on a nightly basis now?
3) We already have a 32-bit compilation test in the form of strfmt_errors. Do we want more?


On release branch:

As far as I can see, this seems to be "keep going as we do right now". Are we removing netbsd voting regressions here too?

Comment 2 Amar Tumballi 2017-06-05 04:41:59 UTC

for 'master':

1) tests/basic is good.

2) lets run netbsd6-smoke 

3) We can run 'netbsd' job in nightly IMO. (doesn't matter much on 'master' branch decision now).


On 'release-x.y':

* For now, lets keep going as is, and see if any changes required later.

Comment 3 Nigel Babu 2017-06-20 06:09:41 UTC

All the changes have been made today.