Bug 1458334
| Summary: | Invalid parameter transport on Class[Nova::Migration::Libvirt] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Gonéri Le Bouder <goneri> |
| Component: | openstack-puppet-modules | Assignee: | Emilien Macchi <emacchi> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Arik Chernetsky <achernet> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 8.0 (Liberty) | CC: | aschultz, fzdarsky, srevivo, yroblamo |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | openstack-tripleo-puppet-elements-0.0.5-2.el7ost | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-06-23 10:12:21 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Gonéri Le Bouder
2017-06-02 15:27:01 UTC
That puddle is bad, this is fixed in the current puddles. The issue with the puddles was tracked in BZ1457138. Please use 2017-06-02.1 I am hitting this error today, with a new deployment of OSP8
The version of the openstack-puppet-modules is:
Name : openstack-puppet-modules
Arch : noarch
Epoch : 1
Version : 7.1.5
Release : 4.el7ost
Error on the deploy:
heat deployment-show 975d3308-8400-4069-9f50-ea00f775b766
{
"status": "FAILED",
"server_id": "06b9dad8-1501-4876-9bd6-d72fe404b19c",
"config_id": "e3e75ce9-42cb-4706-b12f-72af33debe56",
"output_values": {
"deploy_stdout": "",
"deploy_stderr": "Could not retrieve fact='apache_version', resolution='<anonymous>': undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass\nCould not retrieve fact='apache_version', resolution='<anonymous>': undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass\n\u001b[1;31mWarning: Scope(Class[Nova::Vncproxy::Common]): Could not look up qualified variable '::nova::vncproxy::host'; class ::nova::vncproxy has not been evaluated\u001b[0m\n\u001b[1;31mWarning: Scope(Class[Nova::Vncproxy::Common]): Could not look up qualified variable '::nova::vncproxy::vncproxy_protocol'; class ::nova::vncproxy has not been evaluated\u001b[0m\n\u001b[1;31mWarning: Scope(Class[Nova::Vncproxy::Common]): Could not look up qualified variable '::nova::vncproxy::port'; class ::nova::vncproxy has not been evaluated\u001b[0m\n\u001b[1;31mWarning: Scope(Class[Nova::Vncproxy::Common]): Could not look up qualified variable '::nova::vncproxy::vncproxy_path'; class ::nova::vncproxy has not been evaluated\u001b[0m\n\u001b[1;31mError: Invalid parameter transport on Class[Nova::Migration::Libvirt] at /var/lib/heat-config/heat-config-puppet/e3e75ce9-42cb-4706-b12f-72af33debe56.pp:127 on node overcloud-compute-0.localdomain\nWrapped exception:\nInvalid parameter transport\u001b[0m\n\u001b[1;31mError: Invalid parameter transport on Class[Nova::Migration::Libvirt] at /var/lib/heat-config/heat-config-puppet/e3e75ce9-42cb-4706-b12f-72af33debe56.pp:127 on node overcloud-compute-0.localdomain\u001b[0m\n",
"deploy_status_code": 1
},
"creation_time": "2017-06-22T15:43:12",
"updated_time": "2017-06-22T15:43:29",
"input_values": {},
"action": "CREATE",
"status_reason": "deploy_status_code : Deployment exited with non-zero status code: 1",
"id": "975d3308-8400-4069-9f50-ea00f775b766"
}
Also, if it's relevant: Name : openstack-tripleo-heat-templates Arch : noarch Version : 0.8.14 Release : 29.el7ost Is that version of openstack-puppet-modules from the undercloud or the deployed overclouds? This bug was originally due to images with the old version of openstack-puppet-modules used with the newer THT. Please make sure you have openstack-tripleo-puppet-elements-0.0.5-2.el7ost and they are properly loaded Yolanda, I just did a successful OSP8 deployment with the last puddles. I updated to the latest overcloud-full.qcow2 images and that worked. Seems it's bad to use latest undercloud packages, with a not updated OSP8 image for the overcloud. |