Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Description of problem: maxima-runtime-sbcl ans sbcl have symlinks with the same name in /usr/lib/.build-id: 2b/58aae48c1c175070d930e3a5d91982d431625a. So, install is impossible. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): maxima-runtime-sbcl-5.40.0-2.fc27.x86_64 sbcl-1.3.17-1.fc27.x86_64 Some previous versions too... How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try to install/update maxima with sbcl. Actual results: file /usr/lib/.build-id/2b/58aae48c1c175070d930e3a5d91982d431625a conflicts between attempted installs of sbcl-1.3.17-1.fc27.x86_64 and maxima-runtime-sbcl-5.40.0-2.fc27.x86_64 Expected results: Installation without conflicts. Additional info: It may be worth to have a rpm/dnf key/config - to install package(s) without debuginfo parts.
Not sure who's responsible for making unique build-id's, rpm?
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #1) > Not sure who's responsible for making unique build-id's, rpm? Yes, rpmbuild is. If rpmbuild is unable to then a package can set %global _build_id_links none. BTW. This is a duplicate of bug #1436856 but I seem unable change state to mark it as such.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1436856 ***
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #2) > BTW. This is a duplicate of bug #1436856 but I seem unable change state to > mark it as such. I did it. :-)