Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 145858 - eaddress conduit mucks up "address" tag
eaddress conduit mucks up "address" tag
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Matthew Barnes
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-01-22 13:35 EST by chris
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-01-05 14:36:29 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description chris 2005-01-22 13:35:20 EST
When copying a contact from the desktop to the PDA, the eaddress
conduit always sets the address tag on the PDA to "work", irrespective
of whether it's a "home", "work" or "other" address in evolution.

Using evolution-2.0.2-3, gnome-pilot-2.0.12-4, and synchronising with
a PalmOne Zire 31.
Comment 1 Matthew Miller 2006-07-10 16:52:55 EDT
Fedora Core 3 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security
updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and
reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and
hasn't been resolved in the current FC5 updates or in the FC6 test
release, reopen and change the version to match.

Thank you!
Comment 2 chris 2006-12-14 09:54:40 EST
Yep, this is still happening with FC6.  I've just created a new contact in
evolution with only a "home" mailing address, done a sync to the PDA, and it's
arrived on the PDA with the address tagged as "work".

evolution- and gnome-pilot-2.0.15-1.fc6
Comment 3 Matthew Barnes 2007-01-05 14:36:29 EST
Moving this bug report upstream where it will have a better chance of getting
looked at.  I will continue to track the problem there.  Please refer to [1] for
further updates.

[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393247

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.