Bug 1459930 - More clear labeling for the three partitioning methods
More clear labeling for the three partitioning methods
Status: NEW
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Martin Kolman
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2017-06-08 11:19 EDT by Matthew Miller
Modified: 2017-06-09 01:21 EDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Matthew Miller 2017-06-08 11:19:00 EDT
With the addition of Blivit-GUI, we now have 

( ) Automatic
( ) Custom 
( ) Advanced Custom (Blivit-GUI)

I know that long ago research showed that when an "Advanced" option is presented, people tend to choose it even if it's not really right for their needs. And I'm afraid there's going to be a lot of "What's a Blivit???" questions. 

Could we get Design/UX involved for these labels (maybe not in time for F26 but for F27)? I'm thinking something like:

( ) Automatic
( ) Guided (Goal-Oriented)
( ) Custom (Build from Blocks)

but I will definitely defer to design.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.