Description of problem: Currently when a node disappears from the OpenShift cluster it is deleted in CloudForms. We should instead archive it (as other entities). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.8 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Remove one Node from the OpenShift cluster Actual results: The node is removed from the database. Expected results: The node should be archived (not visible in the UI but still in the database). Additional info: This would allow also old performance collection for Nodes that have been removed and also for Containers that were running on those Nodes.
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/15351 https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/1524
Moving to 5.9 because it requires an SQL migration. Anyway I think we should finish this ASAP. Zahi what's the status here?
Federico, the schema change[1] was merged almost 2 months ago. The main PR[2] was also approved long ago and is waiting for merge (I've tried to get some mergers' attention with no success so far). [1] https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-schema/pull/22 [2] https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/15351
Zahi, it seems that the two PR mentioned in comment 6 are merged (you should have moved this to POST). I am moving this to POST now, let me know if there is instead something else left to handle.
(In reply to Federico Simoncelli from comment #7) > Zahi, it seems that the two PR mentioned in comment 6 are merged (you should > have moved this to POST). > > I am moving this to POST now, let me know if there is instead something else > left to handle. I haven't moved it to POST yet since there is still this unresolved issue (pending UI team): https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/issues/1526 (Archived container records should not be displayed in the UI). I'm not sure QE will be able to completely verify this BZ until it will be resolved. So, if you think it should be back ON_DEV please change it (I'm keeping it on POST for now).
Moved to Dev due to this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512843
*** Bug 1512843 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Moving to POST because I no longer see any of the issues described in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/issues/1526
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-kubernetes/pull/209