Bug 146138 - wrong update advisory id
wrong update advisory id
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: tetex (Show other bugs)
2
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jindrich Novy
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-01-25 12:17 EST by Bernd Bartmann
Modified: 2013-07-02 19:05 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-01-27 02:51:23 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Bernd Bartmann 2005-01-25 12:17:09 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5)
Gecko/20041111 Firefox/1.0

Description of problem:
The update to tetex-2.0.2-14FC2.2 was released as FEDORA-2004-048. I
guess this should have been FEDORA-2005-048?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. have a look at the update advisory
2.
3.
    

Additional info:
Comment 1 Jindrich Novy 2005-01-26 03:10:25 EST
Bernd, do you think it's worth to release another announces because of
this typo?
Comment 2 Bernd Bartmann 2005-01-26 03:25:31 EST
During the past weeks we has several advisories were 2004 and 2005
were mixed. If you have a look at the fedora-announce-list archives
you'll see that most rpm maintainers simply replied to their wrong
posting adding a note what was wrong. It would be nice if you could do
so as well.

Due to the huge amout of wrong postings to the announcement list I
maintain my own advisory database and I'd like to have the correct
infos in it.

As there already has been a FEDORA-2004-048 in the past year users
could be confused.
Comment 3 Jindrich Novy 2005-01-26 04:02:44 EST
Ok, I resent the announces one more time and it now awaits moderators
approval. Thanks for noticing.
Comment 4 Jindrich Novy 2005-01-27 02:51:23 EST
Corrected announcement has been released, thanks.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.