Bug 146138 – wrong update advisory id

Bug 146138 - wrong update advisory id

Summary:	wrong update advisory id

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	tetex (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	2
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Jindrich Novy
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2005-01-25 12:17 EST by Bernd Bartmann
Modified:	2013-07-02 19:05 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-01-27 02:51:23 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Bernd Bartmann 2005-01-25 12:17:09 EST

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5)
Gecko/20041111 Firefox/1.0

Description of problem:
The update to tetex-2.0.2-14FC2.2 was released as FEDORA-2004-048. I
guess this should have been FEDORA-2005-048?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. have a look at the update advisory
2.
3.
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jindrich Novy 2005-01-26 03:10:25 EST

Bernd, do you think it's worth to release another announces because of
this typo?

Comment 2 Bernd Bartmann 2005-01-26 03:25:31 EST

During the past weeks we has several advisories were 2004 and 2005
were mixed. If you have a look at the fedora-announce-list archives
you'll see that most rpm maintainers simply replied to their wrong
posting adding a note what was wrong. It would be nice if you could do
so as well.

Due to the huge amout of wrong postings to the announcement list I
maintain my own advisory database and I'd like to have the correct
infos in it.

As there already has been a FEDORA-2004-048 in the past year users
could be confused.

Comment 3 Jindrich Novy 2005-01-26 04:02:44 EST

Ok, I resent the announces one more time and it now awaits moderators
approval. Thanks for noticing.

Comment 4 Jindrich Novy 2005-01-27 02:51:23 EST

Corrected announcement has been released, thanks.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.