Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Created attachment 1288041[details]
Screenshot of incorrect cmd help leading to error
Description of problem:
Using command "lsmcli fs-export -h" gives wrong help by listing only "--fs <FS_ID>" in required arguments while either of "--ro-host" or "--rw-host" is required too, not optional as listed.
Following the help and using only --fs leads to error:
lsmcli: error: please specify --ro-host or --rw-host
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libstoragemgmt-1.4.0-3.el7.x86_64
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. create new volume (lsmcli fs-create --name <FS_NAME> --size <SIZE> --pool <POOL_ID>)
2. get ID of the volume (lsmcli list --type FS)
3. try to export that volume following command help using only listed required arguments (lsmcli fs-export --fs <FS_ID>)
Actual results:
Help message is incorrect, following it leads to error.
Expected results:
Correct help message that does not lead to error.
Additional info:
Although it --ro-host and --rw-host are still in optional, they now say at least on of these is required, which should be clear enough:
--ro-host <RO_HOST> The host/IP has readonly access.
This is repeatable argument.
At least one '--ro-host' or '--rw-host' is required.
--rw-host <RW_HOST> The host/IP has readwrite access.
This is repeatable argument.
At least one '--ro-host' or '--rw-host' is required.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:0864
Created attachment 1288041 [details] Screenshot of incorrect cmd help leading to error Description of problem: Using command "lsmcli fs-export -h" gives wrong help by listing only "--fs <FS_ID>" in required arguments while either of "--ro-host" or "--rw-host" is required too, not optional as listed. Following the help and using only --fs leads to error: lsmcli: error: please specify --ro-host or --rw-host Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libstoragemgmt-1.4.0-3.el7.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. create new volume (lsmcli fs-create --name <FS_NAME> --size <SIZE> --pool <POOL_ID>) 2. get ID of the volume (lsmcli list --type FS) 3. try to export that volume following command help using only listed required arguments (lsmcli fs-export --fs <FS_ID>) Actual results: Help message is incorrect, following it leads to error. Expected results: Correct help message that does not lead to error. Additional info: