Bug 1463035 - SELinux denies 'entrypoint' for gdm-session-worker on /etc/gdm/PreSession/Default on boot of ostree Workstation install
Summary: SELinux denies 'entrypoint' for gdm-session-worker on /etc/gdm/PreSession/Def...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ostree
Version: 27
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Colin Walters
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-06-20 00:54 UTC by Adam Williamson
Modified: 2018-11-30 17:49 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-11-30 17:49:33 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1461978 0 unspecified CLOSED SELinux denies 'execute' for /usr/libexec/nm-dispatcher on boot after install from Atomic Host installer image 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1461978

Description Adam Williamson 2017-06-20 00:54:09 UTC
After installing from the Rawhide 20170615.n.0 Workstation ostree installer image (the most recent that works properly) and booting the installed system, this SELinux denial can be seen in the alert browser:

type=AVC msg=audit(1497919268.940:308): avc:  denied  { entrypoint } for  pid=1864 comm="gdm-session-wor" path="/etc/gdm/PreSession/Default" dev="dm-0" ino=526167 scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:etc_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0

It appears the file is mislabelled on the ostree install: sealert reports that its correct label would be bin_t (not etc_t). Thus this may be the same as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461978 , but I'm not sure, so reporting it separately for now.

Comment 1 Colin Walters 2017-06-20 01:05:08 UTC
99% certain it's a dupe, we'll find out tomorrow; the installer should pick up the new ostree.

Comment 2 Jan Kurik 2017-08-15 08:44:50 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 27 development cycle.
Changing version to '27'.

Comment 3 Ben Cotton 2018-11-27 18:31:31 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 27 is nearing its end of life.
On 2018-Nov-30  Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for
Fedora 27. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases
that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as
EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version' of '27'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 27 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2018-11-30 17:49:33 UTC
Fedora 27 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-11-30. Fedora 27 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.