Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1464384
Should not display default ebs storageclass name when oc get pvc of provisioners-efs
Last modified: 2018-04-05 05:29:04 EDT
Description of problem: Should not display default ebs storageclass when oc get pvc of efs external provisioner Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): oc v3.6.121 kubernetes v1.6.1+5115d708d7 features: Basic-Auth GSSAPI Kerberos SPNEGO How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Prepare OCP instance, record master host name 2.Run the openshift ansible to install external provisoner ansible-playbook -v -i aws playbooks/common/openshift-cluster/openshift_provisioners.yml \ -e openshift_provisioners_install_provisioners=True \ -e openshift_provisioners_efs=True \ -e openshift_provisioners_efs_fsid=xx \ -e openshift_provisioners_efs_region=us-east-1 \ -e openshift_provisioners_efs_aws_access_key_id=xx \ -e openshift_provisioners_efs_aws_secret_access_key=xx \ -e openshift_provisioners_efs_path=/data/persistentvolumes\ -e openshift_provisioners_image_prefix=registry.ops.openshift.com/openshift3/ 3.oc get pvc [root@ip-172-18-11-245 ~]# oc get pvc NAME STATUS VOLUME CAPACITY ACCESSMODES STORAGECLASS AGE provisioners-efs Bound provisioners-efs 1Mi RWX gp2 1h [root@ip-172-18-11-245 ~]# oc get pvc provisioners-efs -o yaml apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolumeClaim metadata: annotations: kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration: | {"apiVersion":"v1","kind":"PersistentVolumeClaim","metadata":{"annotations":{},"name":"provisioners-efs","namespace":"openshift-infra"},"spec":{"accessModes":["ReadWriteMany"],"resources":{"requests":{"storage":"1Mi"}},"selector":{"matchLabels":{"provisioners-efs":"efs"}}}} pv.kubernetes.io/bind-completed: "yes" pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller: "yes" creationTimestamp: 2017-06-22T06:20:20Z name: provisioners-efs namespace: openshift-infra resourceVersion: "7016" selfLink: /api/v1/namespaces/openshift-infra/persistentvolumeclaims/provisioners-efs uid: de1f986c-5712-11e7-b67a-0ee146755e36 spec: accessModes: - ReadWriteMany resources: requests: storage: 1Mi selector: matchLabels: provisioners-efs: efs storageClassName: gp2 volumeName: provisioners-efs status: accessModes: - ReadWriteMany capacity: storage: 1Mi phase: Bound oc get pv [root@ip-172-18-11-245 ~]# oc get pv NAME CAPACITY ACCESSMODES RECLAIMPOLICY STATUS CLAIM STORAGECLASS REASON AGE provisioners-efs 1Mi RWX Retain Bound openshift-infra/provisioners-efs 1h [root@ip-172-18-11-245 ~]# oc get pv provisioners-efs -o yaml apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolume metadata: annotations: kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration: | {"apiVersion":"v1","kind":"PersistentVolume","metadata":{"annotations":{},"labels":{"provisioners-efs":"efs"},"name":"provisioners-efs","namespace":""},"spec":{"accessModes":["ReadWriteMany"],"capacity":{"storage":"1Mi"},"claimRef":{"name":"provisioners-efs","namespace":"openshift-infra"},"nfs":{"path":"/data/persistentvolumes","server":"fs-c8e05981.efs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com"}}} creationTimestamp: 2017-06-22T06:20:03Z labels: provisioners-efs: efs name: provisioners-efs resourceVersion: "8678" selfLink: /api/v1/persistentvolumes/provisioners-efs uid: d3c966a4-5712-11e7-b67a-0ee146755e36 spec: accessModes: - ReadWriteMany capacity: storage: 1Mi claimRef: apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolumeClaim name: provisioners-efs namespace: openshift-infra resourceVersion: "7012" uid: de1f986c-5712-11e7-b67a-0ee146755e36 nfs: path: / server: fs-c8e05981.efs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Retain status: phase: Bound Actual results: When check pvc , there is storageclass name is default ebs storageclass name gp2 Expected results: Should not display default storageclass name gp2 Master Log: Node Log (of failed PODs): PV Dump: PVC Dump: StorageClass Dump (if StorageClass used by PV/PVC): Additional info:
Thanks, pr submitted https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/4571
This is passed. [root@ip-172-18-5-98 ~]# oc get pvc NAME STATUS VOLUME CAPACITY ACCESS MODES STORAGECLASS AGE provisioners-efs Bound provisioners-efs 1Mi RWX 5m
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0636