RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1465824 - RPM macros for Independent Product Policy need improvements
Summary: RPM macros for Independent Product Policy need improvements
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 7.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Lukas Vrabec
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1380854 1393066
Blocks: 1377248
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-06-28 09:53 UTC by Lukas Vrabec
Modified: 2020-01-27 12:34 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1380854
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-10 12:32:41 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:0763 0 None None None 2018-04-10 12:33:49 UTC

Comment 3 Milos Malik 2018-02-13 10:43:44 UTC
The echo vs. /bin/echo issue is fixed now, but ...

the selinux_modules_uninstall macro is able to take [-s <policytype>] as parameter, but semodule always removes the policy module from current policy store. If selinux_modules_uninstall macro was executed under targeted policy with "-s mls" it would remove the policy module from targeted policy store but it would leave the policy module in the mls store.

Comment 5 Milos Malik 2018-02-19 09:31:05 UTC
After discussion with Lukas Vrabec, we agreed that this bug will be switched to VERIFIED and that following issue will be addressed in a new bug:

The selinux_modules_uninstall macro is able to take [-s <policytype>] as parameter, but semodule always removes the policy module from current policy store. If selinux_modules_uninstall macro was executed under targeted policy with "-s mls" it would remove the policy module from targeted policy store but it would leave the policy module in the mls store.

Comment 6 Milos Malik 2018-02-19 09:37:59 UTC
The new bug is BZ#1546664.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2018-04-10 12:32:41 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0763


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.