Bug 1466028 - Kmail + dark theme has white spaces + tiny message body font
Summary: Kmail + dark theme has white spaces + tiny message body font
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: qt5-qtwebengine
Version: 26
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kevin Kofler
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-06-28 19:13 UTC by Colin J Thomson
Modified: 2018-04-23 14:36 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-23 14:36:21 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
kmail tiny font + white spaces (85.35 KB, image/jpeg)
2017-06-28 19:13 UTC, Colin J Thomson
no flags Details

Description Colin J Thomson 2017-06-28 19:13:29 UTC
Created attachment 1292693 [details]
kmail tiny font + white spaces

After version 5.7.1-4 of qt5-qtwebengine, when using Dark themes with Kmail the message body has white space in areas where there is no content.

First reported:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379406

This is still happening with F26 with the latest qt5-qtwebengine-5.9.0-4.fc26.x86_64 from Koji.
In addition this new package also makes the font in the message viewer tiny and I cannot change its size so had to roll back to the previous version.

Attachment shows the white space and the tiny font in the message body, before the update the font size was the same as the message/folder list.

F26, nouveau/Nvidia card, mesa - 17.1.2-2.fc26.nouvlock

Comment 1 Colin J Thomson 2017-07-19 16:12:54 UTC
FYI still seeing this with qt5-qtwebengine-5.9.1-1.fc26

So to eliminate other possible issues I tested with the standard unpatched fedora mesa and the nVidia  packages from RPMFusion with the same result. I have rolled back to using Nouveau/nouvlock packages again.

Comment 2 Colin J Thomson 2017-10-03 20:37:36 UTC
This seems to be fixed, I am now running F27 beta.
Maybe because qt is version 5.9, whereas on F26 it was 5.7.x 
I am also testing with applications 17.08 which could of helped as PIM had a shed load of fixes.

Comment 3 Rex Dieter 2018-04-23 14:36:21 UTC
Marking fixed as f26/f27 both track same qt/qtwebengine releases (5.9LTS and 5.10.x respectively)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.